In message <[email protected]>, dated Mon, 15
Jul 2013, Carl Newton <[email protected]> writes:
I?m in a debate with a lab and a manufacturer that insist that a R&TTE
device doesn?t need to be re-evaluated against a new revision standard
when the previous is withdrawn.
ETSI EN 300 228 V1.7.1 loses the presumption of conformity in 2014
(December I think). Customer is installing a ZigBee component within
his ITE device and wishes to apply the ZigBee transceiver compliance to
his device. I?ve argued that revision V1.8.1 which is listed in the
OJ must be applied after the DoW. Both the ZigBee component
manufacturer and the test lab involved argue that once a device is
?certified? that retesting is not necessary.
I?ve double-checked the Blue Guide and I believe that their
interpretation is not correct and that after the DoW the current
revision listed in the OJ must be stated on the DoC. Safety in
numbers, looking for a sanity check here.
You are almost right; the OJ actually gives the 'docopocoss' - the Date
Of Cessation Of Presumption Of Conformity Of the Superseded Standard,
and after THAT date only the current version of the standard is valid.
It is not always the same as the dow.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
Why is the stapler always empty just when you want it?
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>
