I believe you could make solid cube of EPS foam, should accept a lot of weight. Just a though, I haven't tried (yet).
Ari Honkala EMC/RF Product Line Manager SGS Finland > -----Original Message----- > From: Sundstrom, Michael [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 6. marraskuuta 2013 15:41 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [PSES] EN55022:2006 vs. EN55022:2010 > > Brian, > I'd test a 450 Lbs. device on a rolling cart, but this makes it a floor > standing test then??? > When I was at Nokia we had a closed cell foam 'table' 80cm tall by > 1.25 m wide we used. It could hold 100 Lbs. maybe, not sure you'll find > anything for 450 Lbs.??? > Maybe a foam table with a plastic sheet on top to spread the weight > around? > > > Michael Sundstrom > OHD TREQ Dallas > Electronic Lab Analyst EMC Lead > (214) 579 6312 office > (940) 390 3644 cell > マイク > KB5UKT > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Kunde, Brian [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2013 7:23 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [PSES] EN55022:2006 vs. EN55022:2010 > > So what do they want you to make your test table out of? Styrofoam was > favored the last time I looked into this. Is there composite materials > that work good plus can take a lot of weight? We have bench-top > instruments that weigh over 450 lbs. And you must be able to roll it > around. > > The Other Brian > > -----Original Message----- > From: Julian Jones [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2013 2:20 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [PSES] EN55022:2006 vs. EN55022:2010 > > Biggest change is probably the type of material for the table you use > which needs to be proven not to affect the results. If you have wooden > tables then you are going to have a large uncertainty value. There is > a bit of work needed to prove your material choice has no effect and > doesn't then need to be added to your measurement uncertainty. If your > standard uncertainty was say 5dB and then you found the table you use > at 6GHz affected the level by 6 dB then your MU becomes 11, which is a > large margin to meet for a customer for Class B. > > Rgds > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Amund Westin [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2013 7:09 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [PSES] EN55022:2006 vs. EN55022:2010 > > Any major differences here? I assume the limits are the same ... maybe > small changes on test set-up, etc ...? > > Best regards > Amund > > - > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc- > pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail > to <[email protected]> > > All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: > http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html > > Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site > at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in > well-used formats), large files, etc. > > Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ > Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to > unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html > > For help, send mail to the list administrators: > Scott Douglas <[email protected]> > Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> > > For policy questions, send mail to: > Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> > David Heald: <[email protected]> > > - > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc- > pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail > to <[email protected]> > > All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: > http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html > > Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site > at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in > well-used formats), large files, etc. > > Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ > Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to > unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html > > For help, send mail to the list administrators: > Scott Douglas <[email protected]> > Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> > > For policy questions, send mail to: > Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> > David Heald: <[email protected]> > ________________________________ > > LECO Corporation Notice: This communication may contain confidential > information intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you received > this by mistake, please destroy it and notify us of the error. Thank > you. > > - > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc- > pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail > to <[email protected]> > > All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: > http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html > > Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site > at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in > well-used formats), large files, etc. > > Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ > Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to > unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html > > For help, send mail to the list administrators: > Scott Douglas <[email protected]> > Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> > > For policy questions, send mail to: > Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> > David Heald: <[email protected]> > > - > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc- > pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail > to <[email protected]> > > All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: > http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html > > Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site > at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in > well-used formats), large files, etc. > > Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ > Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to > unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html > > For help, send mail to the list administrators: > Scott Douglas <[email protected]> > Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> > > For policy questions, send mail to: > Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> > David Heald: <[email protected]> Information in this email and any attachments is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed or otherwise directed. Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the Company. Finally, the recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The Company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. All SGS services are rendered in accordance with the applicable SGS conditions of service available on request and accessible at http://www.sgs.com/en/Terms-and-Conditions.aspx - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
