In message <007001cf3f8e$5b16a3b0$1143eb10$@dk>, dated Fri, 14 Mar 2014,
Niels Hougaard <n...@bolls.dk> writes:
? Is this product considered a ?Class B Computer Peripheral? ? which
require a DoC, and an accredited test report from an NVLAP accredited
test lab and appropriate FCC logo markings (DoC or certification
procedure) ?
or
? is the product considered ?Other Class B digital device - - ? ?
which require only a verification and no FCC logo marking (Verification
procedure) ?
Why does FCC make this fine distinction, with such different regulatory
requirements?
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. With best wishes. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
Nondum ex silvis sumus
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <emcp...@radiusnorth.net>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>
