In message <29772537.1146244.1400616153990.JavaMail.root@vms170027>,
dated Tue, 20 May 2014, "Dan Roman, N.C.E." <[email protected]>
writes:
I believe the reasoning for the fish is if they allowed fisherman to
keep the
by-catch they would have no incentive to avoid catching what they were
not
fishing for in the first place.
Well, this is very OT, but do you really think that they WANT to catch
unsaleable fish? The incentive not to is that you don't get any money
for catching it.
The effect of the policy is to reduce the stocks of prey fish that the
saleable fish feed on.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. With best wishes. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
Nondum ex silvis sumus
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>
