In message <[email protected]>, dated
Wed, 6 Aug 2014, Don Gies <[email protected]> writes:
With regard to UL 60950-1 compliance, when we have had equipment, such
as small outdoor telecom equipment that is not intended to be used in
an ITE room per Article 645 of the NEC, we have been able to disregard
the flexible cord length restrictions (mostly the 1.5 meter minimum
rather than the 4.5 meter maximum), after negotiation with the NRTL.
As Ted mentioned, we based our argument on the fact that Article 400,
applying to flexible cords, does not have a length restriction, but
only Article 645 does.
Haven't we just had a thread, 'NRTL / OSHA interpretation of UL60950
clause 3.2.3' that is about small outdoor telephone equipment not being
allowed to have an attached flexible cord?
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. With best wishes. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
Quid faciamus nisi sit?
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>
