The 800 lb gorilla should learn to read and check the applicable standard. 
 (assuming 62109 was applicable for that equipment)

And, I thought the only 800 lb gorillas were the electric utilities.  ;-))
_______________________________________________________________________________ 


Ralph McDiarmid  |   Schneider Electric   |  Solar Business  |   CANADA  | 
  Regulatory Compliance Engineering 



From:
Pete Perkins <[email protected]>
To:
[email protected], 
Date:
08/08/2014 05:47 PM
Subject:
Re: [PSES] question with regard of inverter



Peter,
 
                All well and good per IEC 62109 however the 800lb gorilla 
NRTL assessed the PV DC current monitor assembly (a piece of measurment 
equipment) to be OV CAT  IV when it was assessed for certification. 
 
                The manufacturer grumbled somewhat (since it wasn't 
designed for that OV category) but agreed that it was probably 
appropriate, as did I.  
 
:>)     br,     Pete
 
Peter E Perkins, PE
Principal Product Safety Engineer
PO Box 23427
Tigard, ORe  97281-3427
 
503/452-1201     fone/fax
[email protected]
 
From: Peter Tarver [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, August 08, 2014 3:47 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PSES] question with regard of inverter
 
IEC 62109-1 considers “PV circuits in general” to be OVCII.
 
Regards,
 
Peter Tarver
 
From: McDiarmid, Ralph [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, August 08, 2014 13:57
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PSES] question with regard of inverter
 
My understanding as well, namely, OV categorization in power distribution 
is based on indirect (near-by) lightning strikes. 

_______________________________________________________________________________ 


Ralph McDiarmid  |   Schneider Electric   |  Solar Business  |   CANADA  | 
  Regulatory Compliance Engineering 

From: 
John Woodgate <[email protected]> 
To: 
[email protected], 
Date: 
08/06/2014 01:53 PM 
Subject: 
Re: [PSES] question with regard of inverter
 




In message <[email protected]>, dated Wed, 6 Aug 2014, Richard 
Nute <[email protected]> writes:

>.  Your solar cell DC source is not
>subject to load switching, but is subject to a direct lightning 
>strike. 
>Your DC OVC due to load switching is zero, and your OVC due to
>lightning is beyond OVC IV.

Is resistance to a direct lighting strike required of civilian products? 
I though that only 'indirect strike' was to be resisted, and OVC IV was 
based on that.
-- 
OOO - Own Opinions Only. With best wishes. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
Quid faciamus nisi sit?
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <
[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in 
well-used formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to 
unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
______________________________________________________________________


-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <
[email protected]>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in 
well-used formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to 
unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> 
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected]>
David Heald <[email protected]> 
 
 
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and 
may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not an 
intended recipient, you may not review, use, copy, disclose or distribute 
this message. If you received this message in error, please contact the 
sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. 
 
 
-

----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <
[email protected]>
 
 
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
 
 
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in 
well-used formats), large files, etc.
 
 
 
Website:      http://www.ieee-pses.org/

Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to 
unsubscribe)

List rules:     http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
 
For help, send mail to the list administrators:

Scott Douglas <[email protected]>

Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
 
For policy questions, send mail to:

Jim Bacher  <[email protected]>

David Heald <[email protected]>

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
______________________________________________________________________
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <
[email protected]>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in 
well-used formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to 
unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> 
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected]>
David Heald <[email protected]> 



-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to