In message
<e7baf06cd71c4cc59654ac9ac55e6...@bn1pr0201mb0819.namprd02.prod.outlook.c
om>, dated Fri, 5 Sep 2014, Carpentier Kristiaan
<kristiaan.carpent...@technicolor.com> writes:
In which document can I find the provision that market surveillance
testing is done, in case of dispute, in the way the manufacturer did
it?
As I explained, such a provision cannot be included in a standard. It is
extremely difficult to track down where provisions like this are
documented. I already have one similar query in with the British
authorities at present and I don't want to seem tiresome by adding
another query in quick succession.
If I find the source I will let you know.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. With best wishes. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
Quid faciamus nisi sit?
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <emcp...@radiusnorth.net>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>
