In message <[email protected]>, dated Sat,
27 Sep 2014, Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> writes:
I have received many responses which I will summarize here.
Excellent information. It might be as well to add DIN (www.beuth.de),
which is usually well up in the percentage cost list, if only for a
reason that will become apparent, but mainly because the standard you
require is a 'native' DIN standard and is not obtainable in any other
guise (from any other guys).
Maybe we should measure relative costs in milliANSIs.(;-)
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. With best wishes. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
Quid faciamus nisi sit?
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>
