Hi John,
You can be the last word on the efficiency of the CISPR standards
development procedures. As I am a pusher for action, I generally make
optimistic estimates in hopes that others will join me in the urgency
resulting in faster action. There is a move to take out the
controversial portions of the standard so the rest of CISPR35 can easily
pass. (Even the current failed CISPR35/FDIS passed CENELEC which
resulted in EN50635.) The controversial portions will be addressed in
the working group to be voted on later in some form as future amendments.
Monrad
Note: /The statements and opinions expressed here are my own and do not
necessarily represent those of any company I work for/.
<http://www.oracle.com>
On 10/3/2014 1:04 AM, John Woodgate wrote:
In message <[email protected]>, dated Thu, 2 Oct 2014,
Monrad Monsen <[email protected]> writes:
CISPR and CISPR/I is meeting in Frankfurt during the week of October
20th, and they will figure out a path forward to get CISPR35 approved
quickly (I'm guessing 6 months)
That would mean scrapping all the voting procedures. CISPR 35 is now a
New Work item and must go through the CD, CDV and FDIS stages with
normal timings. It's not sensible to imagine that a
highly-controversial standard can be processed far more quickly than a
bland one.
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>
