In message
<2CF77CABFB3BC045B2724A8EF4182E73129FBB2C78@P3PW5EX1MB13.EX1.SECURESERVER
.NET>, dated Mon, 20 Oct 2014, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]> writes:
Based on every 10° rise reduces life by half,
That has the time dimension missing. A 10° rise for 10 seconds doesn't
reduce life by half!
and if I call 1 year at 22C my baseline, conditioning at 62C for 3.25
weeks will equal 1 year.
Well, now you've introduced the time dimension 'out of the air'.
Conditioning at 62 C for a whole year might reduce life by much more
than a half, or much less, and it depends on the materials involved. For
example, some types of paper would probably be hardly damaged at all.
Natural rubber would be.
Insufficient data.
Does conditioning at 62C for 6.5 weeks equal 2 years?
One can only say 'perhaps'.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. With best wishes. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
Quid faciamus nisi sit?
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>
