These standards do exist for  a good reason, they guarantee
interoperability
with PSTN networks all over the world. So the good news is that testing
is not mandatory,
the bad news is that by skipping them your product may fail in certain
places or even full networks.
As the standards are free, I suggest that at least you  read them and
even better 
implement the tests in your own development lab....

Note that for a long time the telecom operators had internal test
protocols exceeding TBR21
(we tested their equipment for some time) , to allow their equipment
stand out from 
the competition on the market.

The standards mentioned provide for minimum requirements only.

Gert
Ce-test qualified testing bv

-----Original Message-----
From: Carl Newton [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 9:33 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PSES] TTE Equipment and R&TTE Directive

Excellent response Larry.  When something sounds too good to be true it
usually is.  But not in this case.

Thanks very much,

Carl



On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 15:26:53 -0500, Larry K. Stillings
<[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Carl,
>
> What you have surmised is correct. You are not required to meet any 
> line standards is order to comply with the directives.
>
> The DoCs you are seeing, is the voluntary testing to ETSI standards to

> show that the line interface device is compatible with the phone 
> network. I asked several times a joint NIST - EU meetings (in the
> 2000's) about the implementation of TTE standards under the R&TTE 
> directive and always got the same response. There are no formal 
> complaints and therefore no implementation of mandatory standards will

> occur. Also, the other reason the directive is going to become the 
> Radio Equipment Directive (RED), as that is all it has ever really
covered.
>
> Of course being a test lab whom does those tests, we can only make a 
> mild suggestion you should test, as to this day we still have product 
> showing up that don't comply with the ETSI TBR and or ES 203 021-x 
> standards, but that is always a financial / business decision on what 
> the risk is of performing no testing.
>
>
> Larry K. Stillings
> Compliance Worldwide, Inc.
> Test Locally, Sell Globally and Launch Your Products Around the World!
> FCC - Wireless - Telecom - CE Marking - International Approvals - 
> Product Safety
> 357 Main Street
> Sandown, NH 03873
> (603) 887 3903 Fax 887-6445
> www.complianceworldwide.com
>
> Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. 
> If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible

> for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or 
> deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this 
> message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. Please advise 
> immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email 
> for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information

> in this message that do not relate to the official business of my firm

> shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Carl Newton [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 3:10 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [PSES] TTE Equipment and R&TTE Directive
>
> Dear List Members,
>
> I haven't worked with land-line telecom hardware for many years.  I 
> have a device intended for use by handicapped persons that will enable

> a visual alarm if the land-line phone is ringing, so the device is 
> listen-only.
>
> I've found what appears to be good and reliable guidance concerning 
> TTE equipment at this link which indicates that TTE equipment need 
> only comply with the EMCD and LVD:
>
> http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/sectors/rtte/regulatory-framework/index
> _e
> n.htm
>
> However, I'm seeing DoCs and product specs for current TTE equipment 
> that reference the ETSI 201 703 and "TBR" series of standards, and 
> those standards are not listed under the R&TTED, EMCD, or LVD on the 
> Europa Harmonized Standards pages.
>
> Can someone shed some light on this confusing issue?  Is TTE really 
> not required to meet a line connection standard of some type as the 
> Europa link above indicates?
>
> Thanks very much,
>
> Carl
>
> --
>
> -
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society 
> emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your 
> e-mail to <[email protected]>
>
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
> http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
>
> Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities 
> site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for 
> graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc.
>
> Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
> Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to
> unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
>
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
> Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
>
> For policy questions, send mail to:
> Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
> David Heald: <[email protected]>
>
>


--
Using Opera's mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your
e-mail to <[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site
at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in
well-used formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to
unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to