On 1/20/2015 12:20 PM, Mike Sherman ----- Original Message ----- wrote:
Are there alternate medical equipment EMC standards (i.e., 60601-x
series) that would give you more leeway?
Said what I was thinking. It's for a medical use, yes? You said it MUST
use a particular frequency (which BTW suggests a treatment modality
dependent on biology and/or chemistry/pharmacology) and you can't call
it ISM on non-ISM frequencies, at ISM levels. It seems to me you can
then only apply the CE mark if it is approved for medical use (which
you or your customer might have to do anyway if that's so) and that
throws you back to 60601.
And similarly to , oh, MRI, this sounds to me it will need a shielded
room, unless you can come up with suitably built unique coupler. That's
what it looks like to me, anyway.
Cortland Richmond
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>