In message
<dm2pr0401mb1005018879bb5c34c2987c8e82...@dm2pr0401mb1005.namprd04.prod.o
utlook.com>, dated Fri, 20 Mar 2015, Ravinder Ajmani
<[email protected]> writes:
What you say may be true. I often use memory sticks to terminate
unused USB ports during testing, and on several occasions I have come
across high emissions caused by the sticks.
It seems that there should be some control, separate from the present
system where a stick is tested only as a periphery to a 'known good'
computer. That makes 'design for compliance' a pretty indirect and
uncertain matter.
What shall we tell CISPR?(;-)
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. With best wishes. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
When I turn my back on the sun, it's to look for a rainbow
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>
