In a recent UL CSDS notice in the 'work area' for a standard, found this: "Repeatability and Reproducibility - Gage R&R (NOTE: The following is for informational purposes only) The proposal under review may include a reference to whether an assessment of repeatability and reproducibility (R&R) was conducted for a proposed new or revised test requirement. If applicable, associated data and/or other related information may also be included as part of the proposal. The following is intended to provide a brief explanation of the basic concepts associated with Gage R&R... ... In an effort to drive consistency, UL has begun to incorporate Gage R&R concepts into the standards development process for UL"
Would appreciate comments from people currently sitting on STPs, or associated with North American standards development, to comment on the intended end-effect (both political and technical) of requiring gage R&R for process and test data. Thanks, Brian - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org> Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <j.bac...@ieee.org> David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>
