Clause 5.2.3 in EN50178 (Decisive Voltage) should help clarify.  It writes 
about "occurs continuously" and "worst operating condition".

I don't think UL508 will be much help, unless it allows use of UL840 
(insulation coordination) as an alternate approach to spacings.
_______________________________________________________________________________ 


Ralph McDiarmid  |   Schneider Electric   |  Solar Business  |   CANADA  | 
  Regulatory Compliance Engineering 




From:
Boštjan Glavič <[email protected]>
To:
[email protected], 
Date:
09/09/2015 09:47 AM
Subject:
Re: [PSES] requirement for spacings



Dear Scot, Douglas,

Thank you.

Unit is investigated to UL 508, IEC 62477-1 and EN 50178. I have 
experiences with IEC 60950-1 which requires to determine required 
distances based on rated voltage - tolerances not considered. 840 VDC 
might appear on the input during start up of the generator.
However I need to agree with you that 30% tolerances seem to be very high 
and not consider that might be wrong.

Best regards,
Bostjan



On 9. sep. 2015, at 17.41, Douglas Powell <[email protected]<
mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Bostjan,

As Scott mentioned, it is very important to know which end standard is 
being applied to this product. In addition there are many other factors 
such as environmental conditions, application, location, etc.

If this is truly DC powered, it is entirely possible your spacings will be 
for secondary circuits and somewhat reduced. Nevertheless wiring, 
‎connections, fuses and the like will have to be rated and 
certified/listed for that voltage.

If you can provide a little more information about the application and end 
use, we may be able to provide better assistance.

‎All the best, Doug



From: Scott Aldous
Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2015 9:15 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Reply To: Scott Aldous
Subject: Re: [PSES] requirement for spacings


Hi Bostjan,

It's difficult to give detailed guidance without knowing what end 
standards are being applied, but the general guidance in IEC 60664-1 
should be helpful.

In general, +30% tolerance on input voltage is outside the assumptions of 
most (if not all) safety standards. An electrical rating of 560Vdc 
+30%/-15% doesn't seem to be appropriate and should be expressed as a 
range instead. The range here is from 476 - 728 Vdc! For example, 600V 
rated wire would seem to be an acceptable choice for external wiring for 
the input of a device marked with a 560V input rating, but in this case 
the input voltage may be able to be significantly higher than 600V for 
extended periods. A marked rating of 560Vdc would be misleading.

If your end standard allows the clearances to be determined based on 
assumed transient levels, then the nominal input voltage (or voltages) 
becomes less important for clearances as long as you are able to make an 
accurate assumption about the transients. The 840Vdc level potentially 
could be taken as a temporary overvoltage for the purposes of calculation 
of clearance, again depending on the end product standard. At least one 
end product standard that I know of, IEC 62109-1, takes both transient 
overvoltages and temporary overvoltages into account for calculation of 
clearances.

For creepage, at a minimum, I think you would want to base creepage 
distance requirements on the 728Vdc high end of the input voltage (560Vdc 
+ 30%). Whether or not you should use the 840Vdc level instead may depend 
on the specifics of the case, such as how frequently this can happen, what 
controls are in place to ensure that this is reliably the case, etc. 
Again, the requirements of the end product standard need to be taken into 
account and will certainly influence your decision.

On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 4:03 AM, Boštjan Glavič <[email protected]<
mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Dear Experts,

Manufacturer specified rated voltage of his product as 560VDC +30%/-15% 
but input voltage can temporarily reach 840VDC (max 1 min).

Do we need to consider 840VDC for determination of required distances? 
Usually standard requires to consider rated voltage only what is in this 
case 560VDC (marked on the label).

Thank you for your support.
Best regards,
Bostjan



Boštjan Glavič
Laboratory of Electronic Engineering
Head of Laboratory
SIQ Ljubljana, Tržaška cesta 2
SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
T: + 386 (0)1 47 78 265<tel:%2B%20386%20%280%291%2047%2078%20265>
F: + 386 (0)1 47 78 444<tel:%2B%20386%20%280%291%2047%2078%20444>
E-Mail: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>



-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in 
well-used formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to 
unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
David Heald: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>



--
Scott Aldous
Compliance Engineer
Google
650-253-1994
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
-
----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in 
well-used formats), large files, etc.

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to 
unsubscribe)<http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html>
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
David Heald <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>

-
----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in 
well-used formats), large files, etc.

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to 
unsubscribe)<http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html>
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
David Heald <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in 
well-used formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to 
unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
______________________________________________________________________




-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to