In message <[email protected]>, dated Wed, 16 Sep 2015, =?iso-8859-2?Q?Bo=B9tjan_Glavi=E8?= <[email protected]> writes:

Is anyone familiar with 1,3ms surge test according to EN 61000-4-1. I am looking for a test house in EU capable of performing this test. Peak voltage is 735V (3phase unit).

61000-4-1 is an 'overview' standard. It is not cited in the OJ and nothing in it needs to be taken into account now. You may be looking at an earyl edition; you can can 'preview' the current (2007/2007) edition at:

 https://webstore.iec.ch/preview/info_iec61000-4-1%7Bed3.0%7Db.pdf

The Scope clause says:

The object of this part is to give applicability assistance to the technical committees of IEC or other bodies, users and manufacturers of electrical and electronic equipment on EMC standards within the IEC 61000-4 series on testing and measurement techniques and to
provide general recommendations concerning the choice of relevant tests.

There is no mention of a 1.3 ms text or 735 V.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. With best wishes. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
When I turn my back on the sun, it's to look for a rainbow
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion 
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to