All, Now that we've all had some time to use the Third Edition of 61010-1, I wonder what are the typical responses to section 17?
What I usually see are companies using their in-house FMEA/FMECA process to satisfy the requirement of this section. Presumably, with a view to product safety, a formal Design FMEA/FMECA is conducted, risks identified, Criticality & RPN calculated, corrective action plans formulated, ownership assigned and follow-up is scheduled. Of course, with this method, the re-calculated Criticality & RPN should be reduced to an acceptable level before product certification is complete. Is this the method others are using as well? I see no requirement for the certifying agency to do follow-up on action plans, so it occurs to me, what are the preferred methods for companies to do corrective action tracking? Thanks a bunch, Doug -- Douglas E Powell [email protected] http://www.linkedin.com/in/dougp01 ᐧ - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
