On 1/14/2016 5:20 PM, McDiarmid, Ralph wrote:
Would a Near Field probe be a better choice?
That's good for finding a source. but as Ken points out, its not
accurate enough for quantitative evaluation. FWIW... a SA chamber or an
OATS aren't all that hot either,according to a 2001 paper.*
*Reproducibility and Uncertainty in Radiated Emission Measurements at
Open Area Test Sites and in Semi-anechoic
Chambers Using a Spherical Dipole Radiator, Tae-Weon Kang and Hyo-Tae Kim
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY, VOL. 43, NO. 4,
NOVEMBER 2001 677
Cortland Richmond
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>
