Hello Carl - What does the purchase agreement call for? 

In other words - what are you testing to CISPR22 in the first place?

I suggest you research the medical EMC requirements for devices involved
in ambulances, police cars and so on that will guide you. 


Best Regards
Charles Grasso
Compliance Engineer
Echostar Communications
(w) 303-706-5467
(c) 303-204-2974
(t) [email protected]
(e) [email protected]
(e2) [email protected]


-----Original Message-----
From: Carl Newton [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, January 29, 2016 10:10 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [PSES] AU CISPR 22 Class B Interpretation

Group,

My customer builds vehicular laptop and tablet docking stations intended for 
hard mounted use within emergency vehicles such as police and ambulance, as 
well as work trucks and forklifts.  The vehicular power supply narrowly missed 
CISPR 22 radiated Class B limits.  Then their AU Responsible Party told us they 
called the ACMA and they "insisted" this is a Class B device.  I then sent my 
own request to ACMA and received the reply below.

In my opinion the ACMA individual is clearly biased toward the Class B rating, 
but the fact that he leaves the door open to the Class A rating is enough proof 
for me that he agrees that it is a Class A device.  However, my customer is 
looking for safety in numbers.  The author raises a valid note of caution 
concerning receivers within vehicles, but these systems are already compliant 
with CISPR 25 and are widely used within North America and Europe with no 
interference problems so we're not concerned with that warning.

I would appreciate it if some of you would review this information and provide 
your professional opinion as to whether vehicle mounted ITE qualifies as Class 
A or Class B:

+++++++++++++++

Dear Mr Newton

Clause 4.1 of AS/NZS CISPR 22 (which is identical to CISPR 22, Ed. 6.0
(2008)) includes the following;

Class B ITE is intended primarily for use in the domestic environment and may 
include:

-          Personal computers and auxiliary equipment.

Note: The domestic environment is an environment where the use of broadcast and 
television receivers may be expected within distances of 10 m of the apparatus 
concerned.

Given that the class B limits apply to “personal computers” (which would also 
include “tablets”) it would seem logical that your mounting stations “for 
computers and tablets” (which I would think fall within the definition of 
“auxiliary equipment”) should comply with the same limits as the devices they 
are intended to hold.

I would also think that, because police and ambulance vehicles will probably 
have a broadcast (AM/FM) receiver installed in them this would probably 
constitute a “domestic environment”.  I would also question whether it would be 
prudent to have a device meeting the class A limits installed in a vehicle that 
relies heavily on two-way radiocommunications equipment where said device may 
interfere with the operation of this on-board radiocommunications equipment.

Having said that, clause 4.2 of AS/NZS CISPR 22  includes the following;

Class A ITE is a category of all other ITE which satisfies the class A ITE 
limits but not the class B ITE limits.  Such equipment should not be restricted 
in its sale but the following warning shall be included in the instructions for 
use:

Warning

This is a class A product.  In a domestic environment this product may cause 
radio interference in which case the user may be required to take adequate 
measures.

It is up to you whether you wish to comply with the class A or the class B 
limits however, I would personally err on the side of caution – if an ambulance 
or a police car were unable use its radiocommunications equipment and it turned 
out it was due to interference from your device the legal ramifications could 
be costly.

Regards

XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX
Technical Regulation Development Section
Australian  Communications & Media Authority

++++++++++++++++++++++

Thanks group,

Carl



-- 
Using Opera's mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to