Generally agree, but government people can be capricious. For several years, 
have loaned a 'measurement device' to customers having issues with interfacing 
our stuff to their stuff. The device is marked "Property of the Empire. For 
Test and Evaluation Only". The device is a small plastic box with an USB port 
and a terminal block for analog and digital inputs that is embedded inside the 
customer's equipment; and the box has no display/keyboard/etc. Inside this 
little box is an ARM 4 processor and other stuff to measure and record. 

There was one site where the box was supposedly interfering with a zigbee mesh, 
which resulted in another supplier making complaint. The brilliant and charming 
government people said that my little box was essentially a computer so should 
be Class B. 

The customer's laptop computer, while connected to the 'device' USB port, 
caused the interference. The customer had defeated electromechanical interlocks 
to run his equipment with their computer connected to my USB port.

There are several mundane morals to this silly story, but will not restate the 
obvious.

Brian


From: Gary McInturff [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 11:49 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PSES] [EXTERNAL] Re: [PSES] 47 CFR Part 15 Subpart B / ICES-003 
applicable/mandatory for an industrial personal computer?

I interpreted the original post correctly this was a system that was developed 
by the original posters company expressly to be used in the industrial market. 
It might look like a personal computer but there is another factor to be 
considered.
The OEC document provides an escape clause, if you will, in a couple of places 
if you read it carefully enough. The term “marketed” is important in this 
context.  Since I don’t know who can see snippets of a PDF file and I don’t 
want type out the paragraphs I’m going to just refer you to section 15.3 (h), 
15.3 (i) and 15.3(s)
Section (s) defines a personal computer stating “computers that are “marketed” 
through retail outlets, mail order, and advertised to the general public.
        If the original poster is building a computer that isn’t marketed to 
the average consumer, advertises in trade magazines rather that Best Buy type 
circulars, and/or is too big or bulky or even lacking consumer esthetics then 
it’s not a personal computer is industrial equipment. The marketing can also 
include price and supported software functions. 3X the price of an average 
computer, optimized to support only a CNC machine etc. takes it out of the 
personnel computer definition.

Section h and I essentially do the same thing: Class A digital devices are ones 
that are are “marketed Exclusively” for use in Business, industrial and 
commercial environments.

I had this discussion many years ago with the FCC. We were building banking 
automation systems, and we developed our own workstations hardware (IBM 
compatible) and banking specific software. I believe it was running MS O/S, and 
one could play with Excel or Lotus if you bought those applications and loaded 
it onto the computer but the marketing was as I described above, advertised in 
trade journals, was pricey, and was supplied only with our custom designed 
banking automation software. The agreed FCC agree it was not a personal 
computer and was in fact an industrial machine. 

For what it’s worth
Gary

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to