People more familiar with the Brussels mime and actor troupe needs to expound. But for U.S., the IEC-based standards, even where adopted by ANSI and listed by the OSHA NRTL site, cannot be released to the public domain because the original IP belongs to an NGO not financed by the public. Suppose that the IEC could be considered publicly funded if the various states all paid for their respective National Committees.
There is some americano stuff, such as building code (NFPA) that is available online, as this was a separate case involving other than business-to-business requirements; that is, it affected the private, individual citizen right to obtain regulations. Brian From: John Allen [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, March 18, 2016 12:41 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [PSES] Will the ECJ end the New Approach? John Thanks - the "real" article is at https://cemarking.net/future-ce-markings-regulatory-system-in-danger/ Sorry about that. John Allen W.London, UK - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
