Nah - we drive on the right side, the others drive on what's left. :)

 

From: Michael Derby [mailto:micha...@acbcert.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 8, 2016 4:45 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Automated vehicles.

 

And let's not forget that Americans drive on the wrong side of the road!

 

 

From: Ken Javor [mailto:ken.ja...@emccompliance.com] 
Sent: 08 November 2016 12:40
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG <mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG> 
Subject: Re: [PSES] Automated vehicles.

 

Nothing wrong with that except it ignores human nature.  People will take
advantage of the lesser demands on their attention and focus attention
elsewhere. It will be really bad in the short term, when someone is getting
used to a new automated or semi-automated vehicle, but has another car that
isn't.

And wait for the fun with rental cars, which will all be different until
some sort of shakeout occurs and there is standardization....

Ken Javor
Phone: (256) 650-5261

  _____  

From: "McCallum, Andy" <andy.mccal...@mottmac.com
<mailto:andy.mccal...@mottmac.com> >
Reply-To: "McCallum, Andy" <andy.mccal...@mottmac.com
<mailto:andy.mccal...@mottmac.com> >
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 09:05:11 +0000
To: <EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG <mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG> >
Conversation: [PSES] Automated vehicles.
Subject: Re: [PSES] Automated vehicles.

Does anything have to change for the introduction of these systems? Just
leave all responsibility to the human driver. For routine driving the
automatic system should reduce accidents and in exceptional circumstances
the driver has to choose what to do. The driver is responsible all the time.

The driver has to be alert and paying attention all the time which does
subtract from one of the main benefits of the automatic system but it would
allow the systems to be introduced and years and years of data to be
accumulated and analysed.
Fully intelligent automatic systems which take control (responsibility) away
from the driver could still be 10, 20 or a 100 years away.
 
Andy
 

From: Ted Eckert [mailto:000007cf6ebeab9d-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org] 
Sent: 07 November 2016 23:35
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG <mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG> 
Subject: Re: [PSES] Automated vehicles.
 
I don't think anybody is arguing that the vehicle will make worse decisions
than a human driver. The issue I am trying to bring up is that the "blame"
for any incidents that occur will get shifted. Humans will end up making a
decision on who the machines are to operate and how fault is to be
determined. Humans will cede control of an individual vehicle to an
automated system. However, will humans cede control of the larger driving
environment to completely automated decisions? We already get people who
fight red light cameras arguing that the automated system shouldn't be used
to assign fault. It may be an excuse to get out of a ticket, but it also
shows some of human nature. 
 
Humans will create the system, but humans are terrible at assessing risk and
most think they are better at it than they actually are. Humans tend to
think the risk is lower when they are in control than when the risk is out
of their control. I have a friend who is worried about the risk of terrorism
at their place of work. However, the same person just moved, increasing
their one-way commute from 2 miles to 22 miles. The actual risk of death is
much higher from the long commute, but this person feels that they have
control and doesn't see the longer drive as a risk.
 
Do you want to cede societal norms and rules completely to automated
systems? A computer making decisions may decide that humans are part of the
problem. Will we end up with Asimov's three laws of robotics or the
Terminator and Skynet?
 
Ted Eckert
The opinion express do not necessarily reflect those of my employer, Sarah
Conner, HAL or R. Susan Calvin.
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Brian O'Connell [mailto:oconne...@tamuracorp.com] 
Sent: Monday, November 7, 2016 2:36 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG <mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG> 
Subject: Re: [PSES] Automated vehicles.
 
LMAO..
 
There was great consternation of the human suitability for control of
vehicular machinery upon the increasing popularity of automobiles.
 
For most of these contrived situations, the bottom line is the machine would
probably make a better decision than a human. And a machine would be less
apt to enter in a situation where these types of decisions would have to be
made.
 
For my employer's factories, have found that removal of humans from a
process is the most cost-effective way to increase reliability. All hail our
machine overlords.
 
Brian (or my efficient chat-bot)
 
 
From: ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen
[mailto:g.grem...@cetest.nl  <mailto:g.grem...@cetest.nl>
<mailto:g.grem...@cetest.nl> ] 
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2016 11:51 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG <mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
<mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG> <mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG> 
Subject: Re: [PSES] Automated vehicles.
 
In IOT land the rock will warn the cars before it falls...  ;<)
 
Gert
 
 
Van: alfred1520list [mailto:alfred1520l...@gmail.com
<mailto:alfred1520l...@gmail.com> <mailto:alfred1520l...@gmail.com> ] 
Verzonden: maandag 7 november 2016 20:39
Aan: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG <mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
<mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG> <mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG> 
Onderwerp: Re: [PSES] Automated vehicles.
 
 
On November 7, 2016 9:03:11 AM PST, Ted Eckert
<000007cf6ebeab9d-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org
<mailto:000007cf6ebeab9d-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org>
<mailto:000007cf6ebeab9d-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org> > wrote:
With a little imagination, I can come up with many scenarios that appear
"no-win". Imagine you are driving down a mountain road with a rock face on
one side and a long drop off a cliff on the other. Vehicle to vehicle
communications allow your self-driving vehicle to stay close to the car in
front of you. It is a straight road and high speeds are allowed. Now imaging
a rock slide starts dropping a large boulder onto the roadway. The vehicle
in front of yours may hit the rocks, but it remains intact enough to protect
its occupants. Your vehicle can either hit the vehicle in front of you
potentially injuring its passengers or take evasive action risking your
health. What does the vehicle do?
 
I live in the state of Washington where rock slides are common. 
http://www.dnr.wa.gov/programs-and-services/geology/geologic-hazards/landsli
des
<http://www.dnr.wa.gov/programs-and-services/geology/geologic-hazards/landsl
ides>
<http://www.dnr.wa.gov/programs-and-services/geology/geologic-hazards/landsl
ides> 
http://komonews.com/news/local/rock-slide-closes-highway-2-in-central-wash
<http://komonews.com/news/local/rock-slide-closes-highway-2-in-central-wash>
<http://komonews.com/news/local/rock-slide-closes-highway-2-in-central-wash>

http://www.nbcnews.com/id/9957369/ns/us_news-life/t/rock-slide-closes-major-
highway-washington/#.WCCyMIWcGeE
<http://www.nbcnews.com/id/9957369/ns/us_news-life/t/rock-slide-closes-major
-highway-washington/#.WCCyMIWcGeE>
<http://www.nbcnews.com/id/9957369/ns/us_news-life/t/rock-slide-closes-major
-highway-washington/#.WCCyMIWcGeE> 
 
Maybe vehicles will need to be programmed to have a much greater following
distance in areas where there is a rock slide risk. However, there are many
places where a tree can fall on the road, large animals can jump out or a
child could run out into the road unexpectedly. 
 
These aren't situations that are new with self-driving cars. They just
create a new issue of liability. 
 
Ted Eckert
Microsoft Corporation
 
The opinions expressed are my own and do not necessarily reflect those of my
employer.
 
From: alfred1520list [mailto:alfred1520l...@gmail.com
<mailto:alfred1520l...@gmail.com> <mailto:alfred1520l...@gmail.com> ] 
Sent: Monday, November 7, 2016 8:16 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG <mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
<mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG> <mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG> 
Subject: Re: [PSES] Automated vehicles.
 
Obviously I can't think of all possibilities, but it seems to me that these
sort of situations must be corner cases. After all I have never found myself
in a situation where my only options are to hit a person or go down a 300 m
cliff at 100 km/h. Further more, I won't be driving at 100 km/h when there
is a cliff where I can go down!It's called defensive driving. I am sure
defensive driving is programmed into all self driving cars so they are much
less likely to be in this sort of situation. The only exceptions that I can
imagine are deliberate acts on the part of the person.
On November 7, 2016 5:06:36 AM PST, Jim Hulbert <jim.hulb...@pb.com
<mailto:jim.hulb...@pb.com> <mailto:jim.hulb...@pb.com> > wrote:
So a Mercedes automated vehicle would make the decision of who lives and who
dies. That's incredible.
 
Jim Hulbert
 
From: Pawson, James [mailto:james.paw...@echostar.com
<mailto:james.paw...@echostar.com> <mailto:james.paw...@echostar.com> ] 
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2016 6:23 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG <mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
<mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG> <mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG> 
Subject: Re: [PSES] Automated vehicles.
 
This article in The Guardian is related to your first point regarding human
drivers "gaming" driverless cars to gain an advantage
 
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/oct/30/volvo-self-driving-car-au
tonomous
<https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/oct/30/volvo-self-driving-car-a
utonomous> 
 
"The first self-driving cars to be operated by ordinary British drivers will
be left deliberately unmarked so that other drivers will not be tempted to
"take them on", a senior car industry executive has revealed."
 
Also
 
"Meanwhile, Mercedes has made it clear that if a situation arises where a
car has to choose between saving the lives of its occupants or those of
bystanders, it will save the occupants. 'If you know you can save at least
one person, at least save that one. Save the one in the car,' Christoph von
Hugo, manager of driver assistance systems and active safety at Mercedes,
told the Paris Motor Show recently."
 
Bruce Schneier writes a lot on security issues and regularly covers IoT and
occasionally driverless vehicles. His blog makes for interesting reading -
https://www.schneier.com/ <https://www.schneier.com/>   I'm sure it will end
up being the usual round of addition of features, poor programming/testing
(due to budget constraints), vulnerabilities, exploiting, patching, public
outcry, legistlation, etc.
 
All the more reason to buy a bicycle.
 
James
 
 
 
From: Doug Powell [mailto:doug...@gmail.com  <mailto:doug...@gmail.com>
<mailto:doug...@gmail.com> ] 
Sent: 06 November 2016 02:17
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG <mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
<mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG> <mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG> 
Subject: [PSES] Automated vehicles.
 
Although it's Saturday, I'll use this as my Friday Question.
 
 
In light of two recent reports in the InComplisnce Magazine.  I feel
prompted to ask if anyone on this forum can address a couple of questions.  
 
http://incompliancemag.com/u-s-dot-releases-federal-policy-on-automated-vehi
cles/
<http://incompliancemag.com/u-s-dot-releases-federal-policy-on-automated-veh
icles/>
<http://incompliancemag.com/u-s-dot-releases-federal-policy-on-automated-veh
icles/> 
 
http://incompliancemag.com/uber-self-driving-truck-delivers-budweiser-beer/
<http://incompliancemag.com/uber-self-driving-truck-delivers-budweiser-beer/
>
<http://incompliancemag.com/uber-self-driving-truck-delivers-budweiser-beer/
> 
 
Aside from the obvious concerns about vehicle safety, it occurs to me that
there two problem that presently are missing in recent media reporting.  In
particular for the Level 4 & 5 vehicles as described by the SAE and DOT
report.
 
1) I understand that these vehicles, such as the fully automated Budwiser
truck have avoidance systems. Given the human condition of today, I foresee
the distinct possibility of drivers in other vehicles "playing around" in
such a way as to try and force a response from the avoidance algorithms and
cause these vehicles to crash themselves.  This kind of sport would be
exactly what some types would enjoy. What sort of preventative measures have
been taken in this regard? 
 
2) Given the lack of attention to hacking we have already witnessed in the
Internet of Things (IoT) crowd, how are the driverless vehicle people doing
with regard to the cyber security of these vehicles. That is, is it
conceivable that someone may try to hack the truck's operating system and
hijack it?
 
Thanks all,
 
doug
 
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<emc-p...@ieee.org  <mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org> <mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org> >
 
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
<http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html>
<http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html> 
 
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/
<http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/>
<http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/>  can be used for graphics (in
well-used formats), large files, etc.
 
Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/  <http://www.ieee-pses.org/>
<http://www.ieee-pses.org/> 
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html
<http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html> <http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html>
(including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
<http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html>
<http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html> 
 
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org  <mailto:sdoug...@ieee.org>
<mailto:sdoug...@ieee.org> >
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org  <mailto:mcantw...@ieee.org>
<mailto:mcantw...@ieee.org> >
 
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org  <mailto:j.bac...@ieee.org>
<mailto:j.bac...@ieee.org> >
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com  <mailto:dhe...@gmail.com>
<mailto:dhe...@gmail.com> >
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<emc-p...@ieee.org <mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org> >

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in
well-used formats), large files, etc.

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to
unsubscribe)  <http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html>
<http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html> 
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org <mailto:sdoug...@ieee.org> >
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org <mailto:mcantw...@ieee.org> > 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <j.bac...@ieee.org <mailto:j.bac...@ieee.org> >
David Heald <dhe...@gmail.com <mailto:dhe...@gmail.com> > 
-
----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<emc-p...@ieee.org <mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org> >

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in
well-used formats), large files, etc.

Website:      http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to
unsubscribe)  <http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html>
<http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html> 
List rules:     http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org <mailto:sdoug...@ieee.org> >
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org <mailto:mcantw...@ieee.org> > 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher  <j.bac...@ieee.org <mailto:j.bac...@ieee.org> >
David Heald <dhe...@gmail.com <mailto:dhe...@gmail.com> > 

-
----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<emc-p...@ieee.org <mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org> >

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in
well-used formats), large files, etc.

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to
unsubscribe) <http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html> 
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org <mailto:sdoug...@ieee.org> >
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org <mailto:mcantw...@ieee.org> > 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <j.bac...@ieee.org <mailto:j.bac...@ieee.org> >
David Heald <dhe...@gmail.com <mailto:dhe...@gmail.com> > 

-
----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<emc-p...@ieee.org <mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org> >

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in
well-used formats), large files, etc.

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to
unsubscribe) <http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html> 
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org <mailto:sdoug...@ieee.org> >
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org <mailto:mcantw...@ieee.org> > 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <j.bac...@ieee.org <mailto:j.bac...@ieee.org> >
David Heald <dhe...@gmail.com <mailto:dhe...@gmail.com> > 


-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to