DC motors were a notorious source of EMI even 70 years ago. It isn't normally 
difficult to cut the emission to a low enough level and I would encourage that. 
But I am surprised that anyone is using a DC motor with brushes these days. Of 
course, if it has no brushes, there is something wrong with the controller or 
its design.
 
With best wishes DESIGN IT IN! OOO – Own Opinions Only
 <http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk/> www.jmwa.demon.co.uk J M Woodgate and 
Associates Rayleigh England
 
Sylvae in aeternum manent.
 
From: Grace Lin [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 2:46 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [PSES] Incidental Radiators per FCC Part 15
 
Dear Members,
 
Could you please comment how incidental radiators be handled in a test report?  
 
FCC 15.3 defines "Incidental radiator" as "A device that generates radio 
frequency energy during the course of its operation although the device is not 
intentionally designed to generate or emit radio frequency energy. Examples of 
incidental radiators are dc motors, mechanical light switches, etc."
 
FCC 15.3 (Incidental radiators) states "Manufacturers of these devices shall 
employ good engineering practices to minimize the risk of harmful interference."
 
Take a paper dispenser as an example.  Test data with the DC motor running did 
not comply with the Class A/B limits.  Test data without the DC motor running 
complies with the Class B limits.  Should a compliant test report be issued?
 
Thank you very much for your time and I look forward to hearing from you.
 
Best regards,
Grace Lin
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) 
<http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html> 
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
Mike Cantwell <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > 
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
David Heald <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > 

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to