Grace As you’re probably aware, EN 302 195-2 v1.1.1 is the R&TTE version whereas EN 302 195 v2.1.1 is the RED version.
The R&TTE Directive required (that) “all essential radio test suites must be carried out” and these were defined in the Harmonised Standards (or could be specified by a Notified Body) The Radio Equipment Directive does not contain this same requirement, so the standards aren’t structured in quite the same way. If there is no limit for a certain category of device in a particular test, then you could consider that you cannot fail the requirement and so comply without test. You may however wish to test your receiver anyway to understand its capabilities in case there are future changes to the standard that remove the option for Class 3 receivers (this is already planned for some other standards) Regards Charlie Charlie Blackham Sulis Consultants Ltd Tel: +44 (0)7946 624317 LinkedIn: uk.linkedin.com/in/charlieblackham/<http://uk.linkedin.com/in/charlieblackham/> Web: www.sulisconsultants.com<http://www.sulisconsultants.com/> Registered in England and Wales, number 05466247 From: Grace Lin [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 12 December 2016 16:36 To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [PSES] ETSI EN 302 195 v2.1.1 Receiver Blocking Dear Members, Could you please comment if testing of receiver blocking is required for a Class 3 receiver per ETSI EN 302 195 v2.1.1 (the latest version of the standard)? There is no limits for Class 3 receivers. Annex A lists Receiver Blocking as Unconditional Applicable. For reference. Clause 4.3.1 of ETSI EN 302 195-2 v1.1.1 clearly indicates blocking is for Class 1 and Class 2 receivers. Thank you very much for your time and I look forward to hearing from you. Best regards, Grace Lin - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)<http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html> List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> David Heald <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
