Hi, Scenario: Company A is the manufacturer of a PC tested and compliant to FCC Class B. Company B is the manufacturer of a USB accessory tested and compliant to FCC Class B.
Company A imports the accessory and distributes the accessory as part of the system. The accessory is not changed in anyway. Q1 Is additional testing REQUIRED ? If the accessory is now rebranded to reflect the logo from company A, same question. Q2 Is additional testing REQUIRED ? If the answer to Q1 is No and the answer to Q2 is Yes - please explain the difference TIA Best Regards Charles Grasso Compliance Engineer Echostar Technologies (w) 303-706-5467 (c) 303-204-2974 (e) [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> (e2) [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
