Dunno, as Canada supposedly uses the GHS, so the diamond would probably have the Hazcom 2012 requirements, and not the NFPA/OSHA numbers. FWIW, the severity rating numbers are reversed for NFPA701 vs HazCom2012, and there are numerous additional pictograms for GHS.
A while back, OSHA added GHS stuff to the MSDS requirements, but not aware of any DoT requirements for the pictograms. Klingon hazardous chemicals marks all directly translate to 'drink all of this'. Brian From: Doug Powell [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 3:29 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [PSES] NFPA 407 Label use in Canada Hi all, I was wondering, does anyone have experience with using the NFPA 704 chemical diamond in Canada and in Canadian French? I realize NFPA for U.S.A. concerns and possibly there is a Canadian equivalent. Thanks, Doug -- Douglas E Powell [email protected] - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
