Dear listmates,

I was asked an interesting question recently that I'm pretty certain has the 
standard compliance "it depends" answer:
*Is a radio product with all radio functionality intentionally disabled via 
external software load still considered a radio product?

The intent is to repurpose a common electronic HW assembly containing an 
embedded radio as a non-radio finished electronic product.  The finished 
electronic product will be incorporated into a much larger final machine 
assembly where the radio is not needed.  In this particular case it is 
apparently easier and more economical to disable the radio function with 
software load than to modify the subassembly hardware BOM.

*Must products that contain disabled radio function (by way of HW or SW) be 
disclosed as radios, and if so, which countries require the disclosure?

I'm withholding my thoughts in order to be brief, however, I'm hoping the 
experts in this matter will release the hounds and wax eloquently.

Many thanks,
Chet Summers





This email and any files transmitted with it from Charles Machine Works are 
confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to 
which they are addressed.

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to