Dear Scott,
In addition to the Mr. Woodgate comment, please be informed that in the frame 
of the CB Scheme need to pay attention to "National Differences" on IEC 
standards. This is an important issue which not all time is addressed by the 
testing houses which issue the CB Test Reports.
Best Regards,
Steli



Steli Loznen, M.Sc., SM-IEEE
Member of BoG IEEE-PSES
Convener IEC 62A/MT 62354
17-3 Shaul HaMelech Blvd.
Tel Aviv 6436719
Israel
Tel:+972-3-6912668
Fax:+972-3-6913988
Mobile:+972-54-7245794
e-mail: [email protected]

-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Xe [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2017 11:54 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PSES] AW: Harmonised standard withdrawn

Dear John,

It is a good point to note!

Thanks and regards,

Scott


On 22/7/2017, 4:37 PM, "John Woodgate" <[email protected]> wrote:

    The EN and the IEC are *never* identical, especially now that the ENs have 
to include a succession of 'Z' annexes. Large parts of the technical content 
may well be identical, but the ENs include a lot of European 'baggage', which 
can't safely be ignored. 
    
    With best wishes DESIGN IT IN! OOO – Own Opinions Only
    www.jmwa.demon.co.uk J M Woodgate and Associates Rayleigh England
    
    Sylvae in aeternum manent.
    
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Scott Xe [mailto:[email protected]] 
    Sent: 22 July 2017 09:13
    To: John Woodgate <[email protected]>
    Subject: Re: [PSES] AW: Harmonised standard withdrawn
    
    Hi John,
    
    I notice the CB reports that they will conduct the test according to IEC 
standard and the standards for destined market, i.e. EN for EU.  As usual, EN 
standards are derived from IEC standard.  If the IEC standard is listed below 
the EN standard without indication of modified, the IEC compliance report can 
be used as self-declaration of conformity to the directive due to the fact that 
both EN and IEC standards are identical.
    
    Regards,
    
    Scott
    
    
    On 22/7/2017, 2:24 PM, "John Woodgate" <[email protected]> wrote:
    
        That isn't a 'listing' of the IEC standards, it's an indication of what 
the EN was derived from. You can see that, because some of the IEC standards 
are described as '(modified)'.
        
        With best wishes DESIGN IT IN! OOO – Own Opinions Only
        www.jmwa.demon.co.uk J M Woodgate and Associates Rayleigh England
        
        Sylvae in aeternum manent.
        
        -----Original Message-----
        From: Scott Xe [mailto:[email protected]] 
        Sent: 22 July 2017 03:53
        To: John Woodgate <[email protected]>; [email protected]
        Subject: Re: [PSES] AW: Harmonised standard withdrawn
        
        Dear John,
        
        The attached HS list does have IEC standards.  Do they have other 
meaning that I might incorrectly interpret it?
        
        Thanks and regards,
        
        Scott
        
        
        On 22/7/2017, 1:08 AM, "John Woodgate" <[email protected]> wrote:
        
            IEC standards are rarely, if ever, notified in the OJ, because they 
are not harmonized so all EU/CENELEC  countries do not have to accept them.
            
            With best wishes DESIGN IT IN! OOO – Own Opinions Only
            www.jmwa.demon.co.uk J M Woodgate and Associates Rayleigh England
            
            Sylvae in aeternum manent.
            
            -----Original Message-----
            From: Scott Xe [mailto:[email protected]] 
            Sent: 21 July 2017 17:50
            To: [email protected]
            Subject: Re: [PSES] AW: Harmonised standard withdrawn
            
            Hi Durrer,
            
            Both IEC and EN 60335-2-24 were in the harmonised standard list of 
OJEU before they were removed.  Regarding the national standard BS EN 
60335-2-24 should be technically identical with EN 60335-2-24.  Although it is 
still valid in BSI website, the HS removal is due to UK objection.  It does not 
make sense using BS EN 60335-2-24 to declare the compliance with LVD.
            
            It is good suggestion to take care this known issue in risk 
assessment required in LVD.  As this issue is being discussed in IEC to EN 
standard conversion.  For the time being, the latest IEC A2 amendment seems a 
reasonable reference to address the fire risk.
            
            Regards,
            
            Scott
            
            
            On 21/7/2017, 4:16 PM, "Dürrer Bernd" <[email protected]> 
wrote:
            
                Dear Scott,
                
                The removal of the reference to EN 60335-2-24 from the OJEU 
means that compliance with this standard does not provide the presumption of 
conformity as defined in Article 12 of LVD. Actually, the nationally adopted 
versions of this standard are still valid (e.g. BS EN 60335-2-24, 
https://shop.bsigroup.com/ProductDetail/?pid=000000000030236214). As IEC 
60335-2-24 is not listed as an international standard in the OJEU, I do not see 
any advantage in declaring CE compliance with the IEC version, especially as 
the objection raised by the UK against the use of highly flammable materials 
would also apply to fridges compliant with IEC 60335-2-24.
                
                As risk analysis (preferably according to CENELEC Guide 32) is 
a mandatory part of the technical documentation (LVD, Annex III, Module A, 2.), 
the manufacturer is bound to consider the findings in UK's objection and to 
avoid the use of such materials even if they are compliant with the IEC/EN 
standard. Please be aware that the obligations of the manufacturer (LVD, Art. 
6) also include the monitoring of products already in the market and to take 
corrective measures if it is found that a product presents a risk.
                
                Regarding a new product, you may still refer to EN 60335-2-24, 
but it will not give you presumption of conformity. With the CE DoC you declare 
that your electrical equipment provides "a high level of protection of health 
and safety of persons, and of domestic animals and property" (LVD, Art. 1), 
using the standard as a technical means to demonstrate compliance, but 
considering also risks that are not adequately addressed in the standard.
                
                Kind regards,
                
                Bernd
                
                Von: Wiseman, Josh UTC CCS 
[mailto:[email protected]]
                Gesendet: Donnerstag, 20. Juli 2017 21:31
                An: [email protected]
                Betreff: Re: [PSES] Harmonised standard withdrawn
                
                Scott,
                
                You can continue to use EN 60335-1 and reference IEC 60335-2-24 
to show compliance.  Just because the EN is withdrawn doesn’t mean the IEC is 
no longer valid.  Knowing now about the plastic issue, maybe you do some other 
evaluation method for it to ensure it’s safe to be used in that application.
                
                Josh Wiseman
                Senior Compliance Engineer
                
                Taylor Company
                Joshua Wiseman
                Senior Compliance Engineer
                750 N. Blackhawk Blvd. | Rockton, IL 61072
                Office: 815.624.5628 | Cell: 815.262.5517 | Fax: 815.624.5181
                http://www.taylor-company.com/ | 
https://twitter.com/TheTaylorCo | http://www.youtube.com/TheTaylorCompany
                -----------------------------------------------
                This message is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. 
It may contain confidential or legally privileged information. If you are not 
the intended recipient, do not read, copy, use or circulate this message. 
Instead, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this message and 
then delete it from your system.  Internet communications are not secure. While 
every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that this communication has not 
been tampered with, Taylor Company cannot be responsible for alterations made 
to the contents of this message without its express consent, and Taylor Company 
accepts no responsibility for changes to or interception of this message after 
it was sent or for any damage to the recipient's systems or data caused by this 
message or its attachments. Opinions, conclusions and other information 
contained  in this message that do not relate to the official business of 
Taylor Company shall be understood as neither given nor e  ndorsed by Taylor Co 
mpany. Please also note that messages to or from Taylor Company may be 
monitored to ensure compliance with Taylor Company policies and standards and 
to protect our business.
                -----------------------------------------------
                
                From: Scott Xe [mailto:[email protected]]
                Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2017 9:38 AM
                To: mailto:[email protected]
                Subject: [External] [PSES] Harmonised standard withdrawn
                
                The harmonised standard EN 60335-2-24 is removed from the 
harmonised standard list on OJEU.  The common compliance route of 
self-declaration of conformity to LVD using harmonised standard becomes lost.  
What are other options to demonstrating the compliance with LVD?
                
                Thanks and regards,
                
                Scott
                -
                ----------------------------------------------------------------
                This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering 
Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your 
e-mail to <mailto:[email protected]>
                All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web 
at: 
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.ieee-2Dpses.org_emc-2Dpstc.html&d=DwMFaQ&c=ilBQI1lupc9Y65XwNblLtw&r=RyQ6Fr0g7aHfEQCV0zeIZ5rmc48Lfs-2bcf6A3GtyRc&m=EzMmtVsAChI0PUoxZd-jG3QWM48V9wWIGTfBBod8eyM&s=VIRQq3ILdGSf6dvMzNp5OWiCAeSuh8Ssf9WYmfhEpz0&e=
                Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online 
Communities site at 
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__product-2Dcompliance.oc.ieee.org_&d=DwMFaQ&c=ilBQI1lupc9Y65XwNblLtw&r=RyQ6Fr0g7aHfEQCV0zeIZ5rmc48Lfs-2bcf6A3GtyRc&m=EzMmtVsAChI0PUoxZd-jG3QWM48V9wWIGTfBBod8eyM&s=3zDWGtj2JcDcnfAvvRC9oYVUDo7raetrj4p-ATYjkJ0&e=
 can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc.
                Website: 
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.ieee-2Dpses.org_&d=DwMFaQ&c=ilBQI1lupc9Y65XwNblLtw&r=RyQ6Fr0g7aHfEQCV0zeIZ5rmc48Lfs-2bcf6A3GtyRc&m=EzMmtVsAChI0PUoxZd-jG3QWM48V9wWIGTfBBod8eyM&s=9w0yYDC69Ng_SmSEIaEmWhzThHwIfwGAhDPAow8jUyY&e=
                Instructions: 
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.ieee-2Dpses.org_list.html&d=DwMFaQ&c=ilBQI1lupc9Y65XwNblLtw&r=RyQ6Fr0g7aHfEQCV0zeIZ5rmc48Lfs-2bcf6A3GtyRc&m=EzMmtVsAChI0PUoxZd-jG3QWM48V9wWIGTfBBod8eyM&s=_tfBUhxNcZTrOJohdxg3nlXk7j3uL6EehFkkkYcxflA&e=
                List rules: 
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.ieee-2Dpses.org_listrules.html&d=DwMFaQ&c=ilBQI1lupc9Y65XwNblLtw&r=RyQ6Fr0g7aHfEQCV0zeIZ5rmc48Lfs-2bcf6A3GtyRc&m=EzMmtVsAChI0PUoxZd-jG3QWM48V9wWIGTfBBod8eyM&s=-uUeSArkKHSGt0s1-cu4EGS5VC9rX49ocK0RqXkb6Sw&e=
                For help, send mail to the list administrators:
                Scott Douglas <mailto:[email protected]>
                Mike Cantwell <mailto:[email protected]>
                For policy questions, send mail to:
                Jim Bacher <mailto:[email protected]>
                David Heald <mailto:[email protected]>
                -
                ----------------------------------------------------------------
                This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering 
Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your 
e-mail to <mailto:[email protected]>
                All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web 
at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
                Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online 
Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for 
graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc.
                Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
                Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html
                List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
                For help, send mail to the list administrators:
                Scott Douglas <mailto:[email protected]>
                Mike Cantwell <mailto:[email protected]>
                For policy questions, send mail to:
                Jim Bacher <mailto:[email protected]>
                David Heald <mailto:[email protected]>
                
                ________________________________
                
                
                WILO SE
                Nortkirchenstrasse 100, 44263 Dortmund
                Amtsgericht Dortmund, HRB 21356
                www.wilo.com
                
                Vorstand/Executive Board:
                Oliver Hermes (Vorsitzender/Chairman), Dr. Markus Beukenberg, 
Carsten Krumm, Eric Lachambre, Mathias Weyers
                Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender/Chairman of the Supervisory Board:
                Prof. Dr. Norbert Wieselhuber
                
                Dieses Dokument ist vertraulich zu behandeln. Die Weitergabe 
sowie Vervielfaeltigung, Verwertung und Mitteilung seines Inhalts ist nur mit 
unserer ausdruecklichen Genehmigung gestattet. Alle Rechte vorbehalten, 
insbesondere fuer den Fall der Schutzrechtsanmeldung.
                
                This document has to be treated confidentially. Its contents 
are not to be passed on, duplicated, exploited or disclosed without our 
expressed permission. All rights reserved, especially the right to apply for 
protective rights.
                
                -
                ----------------------------------------------------------------
                This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering 
Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your 
e-mail to <[email protected]>
                
                All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
                http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
                
                Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online 
Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for 
graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc.
                
                Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
                Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including 
how to unsubscribe)
                List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
                
                For help, send mail to the list administrators:
                Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
                Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
                
                For policy questions, send mail to:
                Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
                David Heald: <[email protected]>
                
            
            -
            ----------------------------------------------------------------
            This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society 
emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>
            
            All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
            http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
            
            Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities 
site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in 
well-used formats), large files, etc.
            
            Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
            Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to 
unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
            
            For help, send mail to the list administrators:
            Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
            Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
            
            For policy questions, send mail to:
            Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
            David Heald: <[email protected]>
            
            
        
        
        
    
    
    
    

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to 
unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to