Looks good to me. Too often this sort of thing is not well documented, but here is a welcome exception.

John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions Only
J M Woodgate and Associates www.woodjohn.uk
Rayleigh, Essex UK

On 2017-12-30 16:26, Bart De Geeter wrote:

Hello David,

I would refer to the following part of the EN60601-1-2:

*6.1 General*

The documentation of the tests shall contain all the information necessary to facilitate

adequate planning (test plan) and execution (test report) of the tests so that they can be

readily reproduced.

/Compliance is checked by inspection of the test report./

*6.2 Test plan*

Prior to the start of formal testing_, a detailed test plan shall be provided to the test laboratory_.

Deviations from the test plan shall be documented in the test report. See Annex G for

guidance on the recommended content of a test plan.

*Annex G states*_(although informative) that following information should be present as suggested minimum test plan content)_

__

3 Description of the BASIC SAFETY and ESSENTIALPERFORMANCE including a description how the BASIC SAFETY and ESSENTIAL PERFORMANCE will be monitored against the pass/fail criteria during each test

13 IMMUNITY pass/fail criteria:               Specific IMMUNITY pass/fail criteria for BASIC SAFETY and ESSENTIAL PERFORMANCE as per the RISK ANALYSIS (see AnnexI)

Hence, for your ESD case.

You should ask the supplier for his EMC  risk assesment study. (and his PASS/FAIL criteria for the ESD test).

If out of his study, the conclusion is that if the EUT ‘Stops’ after a 15kV discharge, that this behaviour is acceptable and poses no ‘risk’ for the patient  then the test has PASSED.  In the EMC report the observed behaviour should be noted and your conclusion should be based on the provided pass/fail criteria, which is a result of the suppliers risk assessment.

At least, this is my interpretation of the standard. To all people on copy of the reflector, feel free to comment on this.

Greetings,

Bart

*Van:*itl-emc user group [mailto:itl...@itl.co.il]
*Verzonden:* donderdag 28 december 2017 7:38
*Aan:* EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
*Onderwerp:* [PSES] IEC 60601-1-2: 2014 Basic Safety and Essential Performance Pass/Fail Criteria

Hello

A manufacturer of medical equipment has declared that his device has no basic safety or essential requirements.

During ESD testing, the device stopped working after Air Discharges of ±15 kV were applied.

Is this regarded as a failure according to the standard?

No Part 2 particular Safety standards are involved.

Thanks in advance for any responses.

*Regards,***

*David Shidlowsky***| Technical Reviewer

*Address*1 Bat-Sheva St. LOD 7120101 Israel

*Tel*972-8-9186113*Fax* 972-8-9153101

*Mail*: dav...@itlglobal.org <mailto:dav...@itlglobal.org>/dav...@itl.co.il <mailto:dav...@itl.co.il>/e...@itl.co.il *Web* www.itlglobal.orh <http://www.itlglobal.orh>

*Fill out Customer****Satisfaction Survey* <http://app.sqm.co.il/SitePages/Questionnaire.aspx>**

*/Global Certifications You Can Trust /*

This e-mail message may contain privileged or confidential information.

If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose, use, disseminate, distribute, copy or rely upon this message or attachment in any way. If you received this e-mail message in error, please return by forwarding the message and its attachments to the sender.




-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion 
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to