Any remote possibility of a reflective surface diverting the beam to a place where someone could look at it? I think 'stare' is not a good word: I would suggest 'look' for simplicity, but TC82 probably wouldn't agree. There is a time element: 'glance' = 1 s, 'look' = 10 s, ''stare' = 30 s.  A 'look' may be long enough to cause permanent damage.

John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions Only
J M Woodgate and Associates www.woodjohn.uk
Rayleigh, Essex UK

On 2018-01-21 20:48, Charlie Blackham wrote:

All

Class 2 lasers are required to be fitted with a warning against staring directly into the beam

Whilst “stare” is not defined in EN 60825-1, the following is stated

However, dazzle, flash-blindness and afterimages may be caused by a beam from a Class 2 laser product, particularly under low ambient light conditions. This may have indirect general safety implications resulting from temporary disturbance of vision or from startle reactions. Such visual disturbances could be of particular concern if experienced while performing safety-critical operations such as working with machines or at height, with high voltages or driving.

Users are instructed by labelling not to stare into the beam, i.e. to perform active protective reactions by moving the head or closing the eyes and to avoid continued intentional intrabeam viewing.

The application I’m looking at involves a wireless connected laser distance measuring device making an automated measurement every 12 hours of the distance to a structure or tunnel wall for example. Provided that it is not installed in a location where someone could experience an unsafe startle reaction, as discussed above, are there any other issues I should be looking at and anything to prevent the installation of such an automated device?

Thanks

Charlie

*Charlie Blackham*

*Sulis Consultants Ltd*

*Mead House*

*Longwater Road*

*Eversley*

*RG27 0NW*

*UK*

*Tel: +44 (0)7946 624317*

*Email: char...@sulisconsultants.com <mailto:char...@sulisconsultants.com>*

*Web: **www.sulisconsultants.com* <https://outlook.hslive.net/owa/redir.aspx?C=02be3bf3e3a544d1bdf7b6c99fbd12f5&URL=http%3a%2f%2fwww.sulisconsultants.com%2f>

Registered in England and Wales, number 05466247

-
----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org <mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org>>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc.

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org <mailto:sdoug...@ieee.org>>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org <mailto:mcantw...@ieee.org>>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <j.bac...@ieee.org <mailto:j.bac...@ieee.org>>
David Heald <dhe...@gmail.com <mailto:dhe...@gmail.com>>



-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion 
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to