“current limit of 30mA protects 95 % of the population”

They didn’t want to try for 100%  ?     I'm no expert and I don't know if we 
have one on this forum for this complex topic, but  ask how can one limit be 5X 
the other and still afford the same level of protection?  Perhaps not intended 
to, as in shock versus electrocution protection. 

Is 6mA enough for strong muscle reaction or a startle reaction sufficient to 
cause someone to loose balance for instance?

Still, some protection better than none at all. 

Ralph McDiarmid
Product Compliance Specialist
Solar Business
Schneider Electric


From: Pete Perkins [mailto:00000061f3f32d0c-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2018 10:06 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] GFCI vs GFPE discussion

Brian, et al
               
               Low current protection devices are intended to protect people.  

               The long term letgo-immobilization current of 5mA covers the 
full population and opens any circuit which exceeds this level (ok, the UL 
limit for GFCIs is 4mA  to 6 mA),  But you get the idea.  

               The long term Ventricular Fibrillation current limit of 30mA 
protects 95 % of the population on the face of the earth.  The Euro systems use 
of RCDs require this protection in many installations (but I’m not familiar 
with the installation code details).  

               Here in the US we are developing protection devices that will 
work at 15 mA and 25 mA.  These are intended for use with charging electric 
vehicles.  The 15 mA device will be used in residential installations and the 
25 mA device will be used in commercial installations (haven’t followed the 
code development but believe that this is how it is going).  
 
               All  of these devices have been designed for sinusoidal AC 
systems and they all have false tripping issues when used with equipment with 
line switching.  SMPS and VSD units are a problem today in that they trip a 
small number of protection devices; their use is spreading into many more types 
of products.  From my perspective the units each have a statistical range of 
protection  or operation and they seem to overlap a small percentage of the 
time; this gives rise to ‘nuisance tripping’ (meaning undiagnosed tripping).  
This is an issue both in North America (GFCI & AFCI country) as well as the 
EuroZone (RCD devices).  

               I worked with a student project last year which published a 
paper for the 2017 IEEE PSES ISPCE Symposium; Yuen et al, ‘Why do GFCIs keep 
tripping’.  This paper show that some GFCIs can be tricked into operating when 
they shouldn’t.  

               The non-sinusoidal nature of the earth/ground current as well as 
the CM/DM signals have not been fully understood nor taken care of in a 
harmonized way between the protection device and the load.  

               Lot’s of opportunity here for investigation and recommendation 
of mitigation techniques.  

:>)     br,      Pete

Peter E Perkins, PE
Principal Product Safety & Regulatory Affairs Consultant
PO Box 23427
Tigard, ORe  97281-3427

503/452-1201

IEEE Life Fellow
mailto:p.perk...@ieee.org

From: Kunde, Brian [mailto:brian_ku...@lecotc.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2018 2:04 PM
To: mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] GFCI vs GFPE

I’ve recently come to understand that the 30mA Ground-Fault protectors, often 
built into a circuit breaker, is intended to protect the Protective Earth 
(Safety Ground) circuit in the case of a short circuit (opening the circuit 
before the safety ground could be damaged.  It this correct?

Here is my question. I’m evaluating a cut-off saw (5hp) which uses water to 
keep the blade and material cool.  The manufacturer uses a 3-phase 
supplementary circuit breaker which includes the 30mA GFPE option.  This is a 
very expensive part.  When I asked them why they use the GFPE part, they 
couldn’t give me a good answer.  

Would such a part be required on a 3-phase motor driven cutoff saw in either 
North America or Europe?  What standard would dictate this?  

If the only purpose of a GFPE is to protect the Ground Circuit, on products 
that can handle shorts without damaging the ground circuit, would a GFPE still 
be necessary?

Where are GFPE typically used? What industry?  

Please educate me.  This is a new one on me.

Thanks,
Brian

From: Doug Nix [mailto:d...@ieee.org] 
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2018 2:48 PM
To: mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] JOB POSTING - ONTARIO, CANADA

PLEASE CONTACT TED TYCZKA DIRECTLY

A very notable, “high-profile” client who is seeking a Safety & Services 
Sales/Business Development Professional - to join their Machine Services 
Division - the focus of the role is to spearhead/lead the sale of Engineering 
Services related to “functional safety.” 
 
The company sells safety training (workshops), machine assessment/audits, 
engineering design per CSA and/or TUV Safety requirements (“Regulatory 
Compliance”).  The company also sells Remediation and Repair Services (of 
industrial machines) together with Service Contracts ... to customers in the 
aerospace, automotive, forestry, food & beverage, as well as, the packaging 
sectors. 
 
The Safety & Services/Business Development Professional can work from a home 
office - anywhere in Ontario. A Bachelor of Science in Mechanical or Electrical 
Engineering, together with the sale of Machine Safeguard devices and the 
application of these, would be desired ... together, with some exposure to 
Industrial Automation and perhaps Robotics. The key is to have some knowledge 
of safety components, safety scanners, switches, controllers, etc. as well as 
machine building experience. 
 
The employer (a very reputable, Global entity/brand) ... who provide a very 
competitive base salary, lucrative annual bonus/incentive program vs. results, 
plus monthly car allowance, Benefits, Matching RRSP + (Training, Career 
Opportunities and upward mobility). 
 
They are good people, seek an ambitious self-starter who can cover sales from 
the “shop floor” level to the “C Suite” (Boardroom). The company have 
established Sales Reps across Canada ... who can work with the Safety & 
Services Sales Specialist ... this role requires “consultative and solutions 
oriented selling ability.
 
I will ensure absolute confidentiality. Nice opportunity with a great 
organization and strong, capable leadership. Thanks. 
 
Kind professional regards,
Ted Tyczka

President
Golden Mile Management – Consulting Services
2630 Eglinton Avenue East, Toronto, Ontario M1K 2S3
Tel: (416) 266 - 4434
Email: mailto:t...@gmmcs.com
Website: http://www.gmmcs.com/
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <mailto:sdoug...@ieee.org>
Mike Cantwell <mailto:mcantw...@ieee.org> 
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <mailto:j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald <mailto:dhe...@gmail.com> 
________________________________________
LECO Corporation Notice: This communication may contain confidential 
information intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you received this by 
mistake, please destroy it and notify us of the error. Thank you. 
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <mailto:sdoug...@ieee.org>
Mike Cantwell <mailto:mcantw...@ieee.org> 
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <mailto:j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald <mailto:dhe...@gmail.com> 

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
______________________________________________________________________
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <mailto:sdoug...@ieee.org>
Mike Cantwell <mailto:mcantw...@ieee.org> 
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <mailto:j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald <mailto:dhe...@gmail.com> 

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to