In the medical device context, no this is not correct because the failure of the device to provide the claimed medical benefit can be a cause of ‘injury’.
Nick. > On 17 Apr 2018, at 20:17, Richard Nute <ri...@ieee.org> wrote: > > > > Do you agree or disagree with James Gibson’s assertion that > > “Injuries to a living organism can be produced only by some energy > interchange”? > > (ISO 14971, C.2.5 recognizes energy transfer can result in injury.) > - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org> Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <j.bac...@ieee.org> David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>