Thanks Scott. The last sentence makes it very clear.

*"For products with multiple voltage ratings, input or output, the products
are considered within the scope of this Directive as soon as one of the
ratings fall within the given voltage rating."*

Regan


On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 2:55 PM, Scott Aldous <scottald...@google.com>
wrote:

> Hi Regan,
>
> See the LVD guidelines <http://ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/documents/20341>,
> section 6. From the guide:
>
> "The Directive applies to all electrical equipment 8 designed for use with
> a voltage rating
> of between 50 and 1000 V for alternating current and between 75 and 1500 V
> for
> direct current. Voltage ratings refer to the voltage of the electrical
> input or output, not
> to voltages that may appear inside the equipment.
>
> Following discussions with Member States, the Commission has taken the
> position
> that the term “designed for use with a voltage range” shall be understood
> as
> equipment having either a rated input voltage or a rated output voltage
> inside this
> voltage range. Internally there may be higher voltages.
>
> For products with multiple voltage ratings, input or output, the products
> are considered
> within the scope of this Directive as soon as one of the ratings fall
> within the given
> voltage rating."
>
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 2:45 PM Regan Arndt <reganar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi folks.
>>
>> It's been a while since I went on the europa website and I just saw this
>> (never noticed it before). The general europa webpage section of the LVD
>> has bolded the text " *input* *or* *output voltage* ". More
>> interestingly, the conjunction ‘*or*’. Some could now argue that their
>> HV power supply (120/240 VAC input, >1500 V output) or ESD test equipment
>> (4KV+), etc. is exempt from the LVD because they think they have an option
>> due to the interpretation (or misinterpretation) of the word 'OR'.
>> (Yes, I have already seen cases like this) …….perhaps the website should
>> have stated “*and/or*” rather than just “*or*” or word it differently.
>> Again, the key point here is the word 'or'.
>>
>> Also, when I was at the PSES symposium this year in San Jose, I asked a
>> similar question related to this and some seemed to think that this was
>> ‘input’ voltage only.
>>
>> Your comments, opinions & advice on this topic are greatly appreciated.
>>
>> Below are the excerpts:
>>
>> About the Low Voltage Directive (LVD)
>>
>> The LVD covers health and safety risks on electrical equipment operating
>> with an *input* *or* *output voltage* of between:
>>
>> ·        50 and 1000 V for alternating current
>>
>> ·        75 and 1500 V for direct current
>>
>> Excerpt obtained from: http://ec.europa.eu/growth/sectors/electrical-
>> engineering/lvd-directive_en
>>
>>
>> The directive itself does not specifically call out input or output per
>> se. It only states ‘rating’.
>>
>> *Chapter 1, Article 1:*
>>
>> *This Directive shall apply to electrical equipment designed for use with
>> a voltage rating of between 50 and 1 000 V for alternating current and
>> between 75 and 1 500 V for direct current, other than the equipment and
>> phenomena listed in Annex II.*
>>
>>
>>
>> Excerpt from the Directive obtained from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/
>> legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32014L0035
>>
>>
>> Regan Arndt
>> IEEE PSES SCV Chair
>> -
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
>> discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to &LT;
>> emc-p...@ieee.org&GT;
>>
>> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
>> http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
>>
>> Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site
>> at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in
>> well-used formats), large files, etc.
>>
>> Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
>> Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to
>> unsubscribe) <http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html>
>> List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
>>
>> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
>> Scott Douglas &LT;sdoug...@ieee.org&GT;
>> Mike Cantwell &LT;mcantw...@ieee.org&GT;
>>
>> For policy questions, send mail to:
>> Jim Bacher &LT;j.bac...@ieee.org&GT;
>> David Heald &LT;dhe...@gmail.com&GT;
>>
>
>
> --
> Scott Aldous | Regulatory Compliance Program Manager | scottaldous@google.
> com | 650-253-1994
>
>

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to