Interesting discussion, not surprising I have a little empathy, and a whole 
slew of disagreement with both Ken and Ghery ( both Chaps I have a lot of 
respect for ) on this one.

How best to respond is the question?

Cheers,

Derek Walton.

> On Apr 17, 2019, at 1:12 PM, Bill Stumpf <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Absolutely agree with Ken.
>  
> Bill Stumpf
> Lab/Technical Manager
> D.L.S. Elecronic Systems, Inc.
>  
>  
>  
> From: Kenneth Wyatt [mailto:[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>] 
> Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 12:21 PM
> To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [PSES] Question re: Measuring a signal in a noisy environment
>  
> Boy, I have heard all sorts of horror stories from clients with knowledgeable 
> EMC backgrounds who have witnessed sloppy, or just plain wrong, procedures 
> used in commercial EMC test labs. In a lot of cases, the technicians 
> operating these tests have limited background in EM theory and poor knowledge 
> of the actual tests they are running and standards the tests are based on.
>  
> Just because a test lab is assessed per IEC 17025, doesn’t mean much unless 
> they show evidence the documented procedures are actually being followed.
>  
> Many test labs fail to perform frequent verification tests to confirm the 
> measurement system is accurate and is repeatable from one day to the next. 
> When I worked for HP, we did a daily verification test using an RF generator 
> connected to the antenna cable to ensure the back-end system measured the 
> same as the day before. We also ran comb generator tests frequently.
>  
> I always suggest to my clients to make their preferred test lab measure a 
> client-owned comb generator prior to any testing in order to ensure the 
> chamber continues to be reasonably consistent before real measurements are 
> taken.
>  
> It’s also very important to understand the test standards and EUT 
> configurations well enough to ensure the test technician is setting up things 
> correctly. I know of one case where the EUT cabling was configured wrong and 
> their client repeatedly had emissions failures over weeks of retesting until 
> the correct configuration was pointed out in the standard.
>  
> Taking photos of the test setup is very important for day to day test 
> consistency. A difference in one cable position can completely throw off 
> repeatability and thus, mislead any troubleshooting efforts.
>  
> What about ESD simulators? When was it verified last? Does the test lab even 
> have the means to verify the correct tip voltage and pulse characteristics?
>  
> Is all the measurement equipment calibrated and cal tags current?
>  
> I could go on…
>  
> My colleague, Ghery Pettit wrote a recent blog on the subject for 
> Interference Technology: 
> https://interferencetechnology.com/emc-laboratory-selection-audit-items/ 
> <https://interferencetechnology.com/emc-laboratory-selection-audit-items/>
>  
> Cheers, Ken
> 
> _______________________
>  
> I'm here to help you succeed! Feel free to call or email with any questions 
> related to EMC or EMI troubleshooting - at no obligation. I'm always happy to 
> help!
>  
> Kenneth Wyatt
> Wyatt Technical Services LLC
> 56 Aspen Dr.
> Woodland Park, CO 80863
>  
> Phone: (719) 310-5418
>  
> Web Site <http://www.emc-seminars.com/> | Blog <https://design-4-emc.com/>
> The EMC Blog (EDN) 
> <https://www.edn.com/electronics-blogs/4376432/The-EMC-Blog>
> Subscribe to Newsletter 
> <http://www.emc-seminars.com/Newsletter/Newsletter.html>
> Connect with me on LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/kennethwyatt/>
> 
> 
> On Apr 17, 2019, at 10:46 AM, Grasso, Charles <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>  
> To those wondering what the background and conclusion to that question was:
>  
> Background:       Our testing was performed in a newly minted chamber so 
> proper
> EMC installation of our product was challenging. 
> Effect:                   Ingress of high levels of external bb noise.
> Result:                  Proper install eliminated the external noise and now 
> the system passed.
>  
> Concern: While I accept that proper installation and operation of our system 
> is our 
> responsibility, I had expected that the tester would point to the excessive 
> ambient
> and indicate that our data may not be valid. An inexperienced customer would
> have  left thinking that their product had failed. 
>  
> Am I wrong?
>  
>  
> Thanks!
>  
> Charles Grasso 
> W: 303-706-5467
>  
> -
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
> discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
> http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html 
> <http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html>
> Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
> http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ 
> <http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/> can be used for graphics (in 
> well-used formats), large files, etc.
> Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/ <http://www.ieee-pses.org/>
> Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to 
> unsubscribe) <http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html>
> List rules:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 
> <http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html>
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
> Scott Douglas <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> Mike Cantwell <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> For policy questions, send mail to:
> Jim Bacher <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> David Heald <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>  
> -
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
> discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> 
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
> http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html 
> <http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html>
> Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
> http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ 
> <http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/> can be used for graphics (in 
> well-used formats), large files, etc.
> 
> Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ <http://www.ieee-pses.org/>
> Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to 
> unsubscribe) <http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html>
> List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 
> <http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html>
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
> Scott Douglas <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> Mike Cantwell <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> 
> 
> For policy questions, send mail to:
> Jim Bacher <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> David Heald <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> 
> 
> -
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
> discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> 
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
> http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html 
> <http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html>
> Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
> http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ 
> <http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/> can be used for graphics (in 
> well-used formats), large files, etc.
> 
> Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/ <http://www.ieee-pses.org/>
> Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to 
> unsubscribe) <http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html>
> List rules:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 
> <http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html>
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
> Scott Douglas <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> Mike Cantwell <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> 
> For policy questions, send mail to:
> Jim Bacher <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> David Heald <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> 


-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to