I have a Pearson Model 2877 and used it on a project where the electric field was quite strong and the current very minute, so I needed much more electric field shielding than afforded by the typical current probe design. This was after copper taping a conventional current probe (1.25² window diameter so naturally larger seams compared to the Model 2877¹s 0.25² window diameter) with 6 dB higher transfer impedance (into 50 ), and seeing nothing but the electric field coupling. The Model 2877 gave me the electric field shielding I needed to make the measurement.
In terms of frequency coverage, the only way I know to get that wide is with a Hall-effect oscilloscope probe. But it won¹t have the dynamic range. And likely not the E-field shielding (although I have never measured that). The 2877 is quite inexpensive I¹m curious why a substitute is necessary? Ken Javor Phone: (256) 650-5261 Full disclosure: I do work for Pearson Electronics on a very part-time basis. From: "Jones, Richard" <[email protected]> Reply-To: "Jones, Richard" <[email protected]> Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 21:28:07 +0000 To: <[email protected]> Conversation: Pearson RF Current Probe Subject: [PSES] Pearson RF Current Probe Anybody know of an equivalent to a Pearson 2877? Rich - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) <http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html> List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher <[email protected]> David Heald <[email protected]> - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
