Hi Mark:

 

Here’s a start:

 

https://www.ecmag.com/section/codes-standards/conductors-connected-parallel-
each-set-must-have-same-electrical

 

https://www.electricallicenserenewal.com/Electrical-Continuing-Education-Cou
rses/NEC-Content.php?sectionID=297.0

 

https://www.ecmag.com/section/codes-standards/derating-parallel-conductors

 

https://iaeimagazine.org/features/parallel-conductors-revisited/

 

Stay safe, and best regards,

Rich

 

 

 

 

 

 

From: Stultz, Mark <[email protected]> 
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2021 9:05 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [PSES] Ganged Conductors in Machinery

 

Hello all,

 

Is it permissible to combined separate conductors to carry a load in
parallel within machinery?  If it is allowable, what derating would be
required?  I can’t find reference to this in IEC 60204-1 or NFPA 79.

 

Many thanks,

 


 

 


Mark Stultz

10175 Philipp Parkway


Senior Mechanical Development Engineer

Streetsboro, OH 44241


CMSE® – Certified Machinery Safety Expert (TÜV NORD)

330-342-2402


Automated Packaging Systems

 


 

 




 

 


 <https://www.autobag.com/> autobag.com

 <https://sealedair.com/> SealedAir.com

 

 

 


-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to