Hi Joe:

 

Isn't it also true that if the secondary has no accessible conductive parts,
and the entire enclosure meets the requirements for reinforced insulation,
then no safety insulation at all is required in the transformer?  In this
case, wouldn't  the entire contents of the enclosure would be treated as
though they are 230 Vrms AC mains.

 

Yes!

 

Thanks for describing this alternative.  In this case, the transformer has
one layer of tape which is functional insulation.  Or none, in which case
the transformer is an auto-transformer. 

 

Best regards,

Rich  

 

 

From: Joe Randolph <j...@randolph-telecom.com> 
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2022 2:22 PM
To: ri...@ieee.org; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: [PSES] Numbers of insulation layers in transformer (IEC62368)

 

Hi Rich:

 

You said the following:

 

If the secondary has no accessible conductive parts, then the insulation
between the secondary and accessible surfaces (whether or not conductive) is
"supplementary insulation":  transformer can have one insulation layer,
basic.  (This is uncommon construction and will likely be not acceptable to
many certification houses.)  

 

Isn't it also true that if the secondary has no accessible conductive parts,
and the entire enclosure meets the requirements for reinforced insulation,
then no safety insulation at all is required in the transformer?  In this
case, wouldn't  the entire contents of the enclosure would be treated as
though they are 230 Vrms AC mains.

 

I realize that this might seem like an unlikely type of product, but I have
seen such configurations used in the past, it seemed okay to me.

 

Joe Randolph

Telecom Design Consultant

Randolph Telecom, Inc.

781-721-2848 (USA)

j...@randolph-telecom.com <mailto:j...@randolph-telecom.com> 

http://www.randolph-telecom.com

 

From: Richard Nute [mailto:ri...@ieee.org] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2022 5:09 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG <mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG> 
Subject: Re: [PSES] Numbers of insulation layers in transformer (IEC62368)

 

 

 

Hi Amund:

 

Since the unit does not have grounding/earthing, it is therefore
double-insulated with respect to the input 230 volts (and must bear the
double-insulated symbol).  

 

This requires all accessible conductive parts and accessible surfaces to be
double-insulated from the 230 volts.  

 

If the secondary circuit has any accessible conductive parts (e.g., metal
antenna), then the secondary must be double-insulated from the 230 volts:
transformer must have two insulation layers, basic and supplementary. (This
is the most common construction.) 

 

If the secondary has no accessible conductive parts, then the insulation
between the secondary and accessible surfaces (whether or not conductive) is
"supplementary insulation":  transformer can have one insulation layer,
basic.  (This is uncommon construction and will likely be not acceptable to
many certification houses.)  

 

Good luck, and best regards,

Rich

 

 

From: Amund Westin <am...@westin-emission.no
<mailto:am...@westin-emission.no> > 
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2022 1:02 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG <mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG> 
Subject: [PSES] Numbers of insulation layers in transformer (IEC62368)

 

Do I need one or two insulation layers (tape) between the primary and
secondary windings?

Can find an absolute answer in the standard IEC62368.

 

 

Product:

Input 230VAC

Secondary 24VDC for other Low volt circuits 

No grounding /earthing

No cable outputs

Plastic enclosure

Radio HUB product 

 

Thanks.

 

Best regards

Amund

 

-
----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<emc-p...@ieee.org <mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org> >

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in
well-used formats), large files, etc.

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to
unsubscribe) <http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html> 
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org <mailto:sdoug...@ieee.org> >
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org <mailto:mcantw...@ieee.org> > 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <j.bac...@ieee.org <mailto:j.bac...@ieee.org> >
David Heald <dhe...@gmail.com <mailto:dhe...@gmail.com> > 


-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to