Paolo,

I’m going to go on some assumptions here that you are familiar with the 
measurement setup and process in Part 15 and ANSI C63.4:2014. If you look in 
section 8.2.4 there is a discussion on antenna beamwidth

You need to keep the antennas within their 3 dB of radiation or reception also 
known as its half power beamwidth. This typically does not come into play from 
30 MHz to 1 GHz since most if not all standard EMC antennas are very wideband 
receivers in multiple directions. Although you should look at the datasheets of 
your measurement antennas to be sure.

Where this does come into play (mainly) is above 1 GHz. You will find when you 
study the datasheets of various antennas used above 1 GHz, that their reception 
gets narrow.

Let’s take for example the EMCO / ETS Lindgren 3115 antenna and there are many 
other similar antennas from ARA, Com-Power, etc. that follow this design which 
ironically was only designed for usage from 1 to 12 GHz. Here is a copy of the 
3115’s ½ power beamwidth, you will observe that it has good E plane reception 
until about 14 GHz, and then drops of significantly from 15.5 to 17.5 GHz to 15 
degrees or so.

By doing some math you can figure out at a given measurement distance (say 3 
meters) that a 15 degree half power beamwidth will only stay in the antennas 
reception area at some given height above the floor. You have a product on an 
80 cm table, and then you are raising and lowering the antenna from 1 to 4 
meters. At some point up the mast you are going to get out of the receiving 
beamwidth of the antenna and technically won’t be measuring any signals from 
the product at a given distance.

[cid:[email protected]]

This is really what became termed as bore-sighting although I believe that 
language has been removed from the standards at this point, as staying within 
the cone of reception or ½ power beamwidth is a much more accurate description 
of what needs to be done. An antenna mast that supports bore-sighting will 
fulfill the requirements as it will “point” the antenna towards an 80 cm high 
turntable at a 3 meter distance so it is within its ½ power beamwidth at all 
times as it travels up and down the antenna mast.

Larry K. Stillings
Compliance Worldwide, Inc.
Test Locally, Sell Globally and Launch Your Products Around the World!
FCC - Wireless - Telecom - CE Marking - International Approvals - Product Safety
357 Main Street
Sandown, NH 03873
(603) 887 3903 Fax 887-6445
complianceworldwide.com<https://complianceworldwide.com/>
Follow us on social media
 [cid:[email protected]]   
linkedin.com/company/compliance-worldwide-inc   
[cid:[email protected]]  twitter.com/complianceww
Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you 
are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of 
the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to 
anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the 
sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not 
consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and 
other information in this message that do not relate to the official business 
of my firm shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.

From: Paolo Roncone
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2023 1:06 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [PSES] Antenna tilting or boresigjting for radiated emissions

Hi all,

Is there an FCC / ANSI requirement, or  maybe just recommendation, for antenna 
tilting or boresighting wrt radiated emissions in a semi-anechoic chamber ?

If yes, can you please get me the reference section in FCC Part15 or ANSI std 
or somewhere else?


Thanks a lot in advance!
Paolo
-
----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to 
unsubscribe)<http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html>
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
David Heald <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>

________________________________

To unsubscribe from the EMC-PSTC list, click the following link: 
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>
_________________________________________________
To unsubscribe from the EMC-PSTC list, click the following link: 
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1

Reply via email to