I finally got the feedback I was seeking from a swarm of quotes for EMC testing for FCC and ISED, concerning qualifying a product with an FCC-registered WiFi module deployed onto our PCB. I've tried processing the FCC orders on what upholds or doesn't when placing the module on your PCB and came away more confused than before. The official way to test, measure and report that your WiFi module is still OK when mounted on your board is via the FCC guideline, KDB 996369 for Spurious Emissions. This saves the whole suite of intentional radiator testing to the tune of $15-20k. What I am faced with is that our product already did the full testing, and got its own FCC ID, so taking this approach will probably require re-registration with FCC, am I correct? Next question is: can one keep Bluetooth (BT) classic, but dispense with BT/Low Energy easily? This also costs an extra $6-7k in an EMC lab and I don't even know how much BTLE is really used. All the best,Colorado Brian
- ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Website: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/ Instructions: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) List rules: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Mike Sherman at: [email protected] Rick Linford at: [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> _________________________________________________ To unsubscribe from the EMC-PSTC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1
