Traditionally, dielectric strength (hipot) tests were done only to verify
clearance.  Now, the industry seems to think there is figure of merit
associated with leakage current in solid insulation during that test.  There
are other tests which can be performed to verify the integrity of solid
insulation.

 

As Rich points out, the pass/fail criterion of a hipot test is
breakdown/flashover of the air (a spark) which should trip a properly
designed tester.

 

If not removed or otherwise isolated from the hipot test, a MOV or a GDT
will likely trip the tester by their excessive leakage current.  Y1 and Y2
capacitors should not cause a trip and can be left in circuit during the
test unless their reactance presents a difficulty. Most standards will
permit a d.c. test voltage in lieu of an a.c. test.

 

Ralph

 

From: Richard Nute <[email protected]> 
Sent: March 12, 2026 2:43 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PSES] Dielectric test, electric appliances

 

 

Hi Brian:

 

The hi-pot (dielectric withstand) test is to verify that the power line
solid insulations and air insulations (clearances) to ground will withstand
(without breakdown) the transient voltages coming in on the power lines. 

 

The hi-pot tester (ac) must provide sufficient current to the Y-caps to
achieve the required test voltage.  You can calculate the test current from
the leakage current, as the test current is simply a voltage multiple of the
leakage current voltage.  (You can use a dc hi-pot tester, at the peak of
the ac test voltage, but there still will be current due to the rate of
voltage rise charging the Y-caps.)

 

Duration of the hi-pot test usually is one minute, but need only be a few
seconds as ionization of air only takes a few seconds.  I assume your solid
insulation has more than adequate dielectric strength, so air insulation
(clearance) is more likely to fail.   

 

Y-caps and MOVs are rated to withstand the hi-pot test.  They have to
withstand the transient voltages in service!  They do not need to be removed
during the hi-pot test.  

 

Pass criterion is very simple:  No breakdown!  If a breakdown occurs, you
can hear it!  And, a good hi-pot tester will shut down and sound an alarm.


 

The hi-pot test tests the entire primary insulation between mains and
ground.  From power input to the isolation to grounded secondary (if any).  

 

Good luck!

Rich

 

 

From: Brian Gregory <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> > 
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2026 12:54 PM
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
Subject: [PSES] Dielectric test, electric appliances

 

 Hello safety colleagues,

 

We are looking at some changes for End of Line dielectric test for a 240-V
rated residential appliance - not medical! - for N. American residential
applications.

 

Interestingly, the appropriate UL standards detail test voltages and
duration, are a bit vague about legal removal of solid state components
"that are capable of being damaged" and absolutely silent on the level of
allowable leakage current.  I have looked at 3 different safety standards
for north american products, and not one specifies a failure limit.  This
includes the main BESS/PV inverter standard, UL 1741, which is typically
very precise.  

 

Past experience at an NRTL involved setting the HiPot to 5 or perhaps 10 mA
for the test, but I can't remember what mandated the successful test level.
My friendly AI bot a few weeks ago suggests 3.5 or 5 mA as allowable for
residential appliances, but not what requirement(s) there may be apart from
perhaps 60335.  UL 60335 is not cited in any of the product safety standards
that cover our current products. That same bot is now telling me 100 mA is
allowed during dielectric withstand testing.  So, if we can find a HiPot
tester with 100mA or more capacity, we can speed up our production line by
not having to remove Y-caps and/or MOVs, or go to the 1-second test levels,
or both, and still get a base level check that a board's insulation system
wasn't compromised during production or assembly.

 

This brings up some interesting questions as we evaluate bringing up a new
production line.  

 

-  is there an actual requirement for the mA draw, or is it just what one
can find in a hipot device?   The testers we've bought & rented stop at 10
or 20 mA.

-  are there stated mA limits for dielectric breakdown detection?   If the
bot is right and 60335 is correct, what's the specific clause?

-  is there anything besides board level defects the dielectric test is
supposed to catch?

- could one include calculations for mA draw from a device's Y-caps and/or
MOVs in an allowable EoL test plan, in case the inspector doesn't trust some
chinese-made hipot with 200 mA capacity and asks us to justify a given
limit?

 

 thanks all, stay safe.

 

Colorado Brian 

 

 

  _____  

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>  

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
<https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/%20>  

Website: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/  <https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/> 
Instructions: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/list.html (including how to
unsubscribe) <https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/list.html> 
List rules:
https://pses.ieee.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/EM-PSTC-List-Rules.pdf 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Mike Sherman at: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
Rick Linford at: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>  

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher at: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>  

  _____  

To unsubscribe from the EMC-PSTC list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC
<https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1> &A=1 


-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
[email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Website:  https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/
Instructions:  https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/list.html (including how to 
unsubscribe)
List rules: 
https://pses.ieee.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/EM-PSTC-List-Rules.pdf

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Mike Sherman at: [email protected]
Rick Linford at: [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
_________________________________________________
To unsubscribe from the EMC-PSTC list, click the following link: 
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1

Reply via email to