Stuart Stevenson wrote: > I believe my personal choice of a low maintenance drive system for > a waterjet would be a cog belt. You would be able to minimize, if not > eliminate, belt whip by using a wider belt than the drive requires and > supporting along the length of the axis travel. There is never going to be belt whip with waterjet, unless you are cutting shim stock. Normally, a water jet cuts quite slowly. I suppose there could be some whipping at the end of a rapid traverse, but the CNC control should slow things down as the head approaches the next place to start cutting. Restoring original > drive specs 'could' then be as simple as replacing the belt. > I think cleanliness will be just as much of a problem with linear > drives as any other drive system. If the abrasive and dross are > anything like chips it will be IMPOSSIBLE to keep them out of > everything. Actually, waterjet seems fairly clean. A big tank of water catches the jet after it punches through, and they use a rubber sheet to trap the backspray off the work surface while punching through. I'm no expert, by far, but I did attend a couple hour demo our shop took when they were thinking about getting one. The machine had a fair bit of time on it, but everything above the head (where the X-Y axes were) was clean. Everything below was pretty messy.
Jon ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
