On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 14:09 -0400, Stephen Wille Padnos wrote:
> Kirk Wallace wrote:
> 
> >[snip]
> >
> >It makes sense that MIN_FERROR could be much smaller than FERROR, but
> >after making other adjustments and cut and try, I worked these numbers
> >down to FERROR = 0.0002 and MIN_FERROR = 0.0025. It may be an indication
> >that there are issues that I have yet to discover.
> >
> You could remove the MIN_FERROR setting, and make FERROR = 0.0025, and 
> it would make no difference.
> 
> The way you have it set up, FERROR is basically unused, and MIN_FERROR 
> is being used in its place.  The only time that both have an effect is 
> when FERROR is larger than MIN_FERROR.
> 
> - Steve

If FERROR is unused in my scenario, why do I get a following error
message when the only change I make is from FERROR = 0.0002 to FERROR =
0.0001?
-- 
Kirk Wallace
(Hardinge HNC lathe, California, USA
http://www.wallacecompany.com/machine_shop/ )



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to