On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 08:30:59PM +0100, paul_c wrote: > > As if anything that has gone before has gone through a review process or > comments & suggestions acted on. i.e.:
Well, there is a democratic process that gives the users the power to decide who gets to determine the direction of the EMC project: the vote for the board of directors. It is unfortunate that you silently ignored it when I nominated you for the board on July 28 2007. The nomination was seconded so all you would have had to do was accept. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.distributions.emc.user/2524/focus=2583 If you had accepted the nomination, the users could have chosen you for this influential position if they found merit in your complaints and suggestions. Like when you chose to not retain your CVS commit access, you decline any chance at actual productive participation in the project in favor of public rants on the mailing list. This seems very peculiar to me. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
