Hi,

After playing with Ed's scripts which work fine for my purpose, my 
frustration with AXIS has grown..... I wish I was able to modify it but 
I'm not clever enough :-( .

I appreciate that the cause of my frustration is not to do strictly with 
the way AXIS works - it does so very well - but with the way it is 
limited in displaying some scripts relating to rotary axes. In the case 
of Ed's scripts, you set the Y-axis zero to coincide with the edge of 
the disk or cylinder you wish to cut teeth into and the script then cuts 
a groove along the X-axis, returns and rotates the A-axis, then 
repeating until all teeth are cut. The AXIS display, however, shows only 
a single toolpath which it repeats while the tool angle changes around 
the X-axis. Whilst giving a fair interpretation of what the script is 
asking for, this doesn't really relate to what one sees when looking at 
the machine where the work, not the tool, is rotating around the A-axis 
and each toolpath generates a new cut which remains permanent. I guess 
what I am suggesting is that it would be nice if there could be a 
feature in AXIS which would allow you to offset the X, Y and/or Z axes 
from the tool position (to put the tool on the edge of the rotating 
work) and for the repeating cuts (toolpaths) already made to be shown 
arrayed around the relevant axis. Is this possible?

While on this subject, would it also be possible to make the axes 
interchangeable? I'm sure there are a number of people who have 4-axis 
machines who, like me, tend to use the rotary axis in different 
positions. In the real world, or on a multi-axis machine, each of these 
different positions - parallel to the each of the three linear axes - 
would normally have its own axis designation A, B or C. However, in our 
world, the rotary axis always seems to be A whichever way it is mounted 
and so, again, the AXIS display doesn't reflect what is really happening 
on the machine. It is, of course, possible to give the axis parallel to 
the Y-axis, the designation of B in our scripts but, to do so would 
require a new .ini file to handle that axis and, as far as I can tell, 
AXIS is not capable at the moment of displaying a B-axis.

While actually cutting the work, these limitations are probably not too 
significant but they do take on some significance when you are trying to 
develop a script and verify that it is going to work correctly before 
you commit to hacking at metal..

I realise that I am probably asking for the moon but it would be nice if 
these points could be considered in any future development of AXIS or 
any other display system.

Thank you,

Ian
--------------------------------
Ian W. Wright
Sheffield  UK


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to