[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: > Send Emc-users mailing list submissions to > emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Emc-users digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: This is a test, since my last several posts have been > swallowed. (Erik Christiansen) > 2. Re: Problem on EMC2 starting with rtai_hall.ko > (??????? ?????????????) > 3. Re: Stop and Go (Jimmy Schneiderman) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 20:22:56 +1000 > From: Erik Christiansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [Emc-users] This is a test, since my last several posts > have been swallowed. > To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)" > <emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 11:58:49AM -0500, Jon Elson wrote: > >> Erik Christiansen wrote: >> >>> I've tweaked my postfix configuration very slightly, and am hoping that >>> will allow me to post, despite sourceforge's anti-spam upgrade. >>> >>> >>> >> Yeah, what are they up to? I have already had a perfectly reasonable >> message rejected. >> This was the "reason" for the message being rejected. >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> retry time not reached for any host after a long failure period >> >> >> Maybe just a computer glitch..... >> > > Sounds like it, but that error message implies that your message was > rejected because the "failure period" was not long enough. ;-) > But sysadmins can put any text they like, and even muck with the > quasi-pseudo-standardised 5xx and 4xx error codes, so it can be good > going to half understand half of them. > > In my case it appears that my dynamic IP was falling foul of list host > anti-spam measures, and my initial attempts to relay my posts via the > ISP were a tad off. In case anyone else is running postfix, I had: > > relayhost = mail.internode.on.net > # Which should have been: > relayhost = [mail.internode.on.net] > > The former worked for all destinations other than sourceforge. > (What's the difference? Well the doco says "... [] eliminates DNS MX > lookups.", but I'm not digging further, 'coz it now works. > > Actually Jon, it's from your helpful off-list reply on "Thu, 31 Jul 2008 > 12:10:59 -0500", where a prior bounce was described, that I > gained the inkling that sourceforge had begun employing SpamAsassin. > (A spam-free list is worth a lot, but can cost a lot of effort to find > out how to get back on, especially when there's no reply from postmaster > or hostmaster, despite the RFCs.) > > Erik > > Hi,
my name is Michael and i am from Germany. So first of all i have to apologize my bad english. I`m using EMC2 for a longer time now on a self-made milling machine and it works very well. So thanks for that software. No i`m planning another machine where I need several I/O connections. So I bought an Anything I/O card from Mesa, the 7I43. Furthermore I bought a 7i42 break out bord. My problem is, i don`t exactly now how to wire these Cards. Also I can`t find a manual or something for the 7i42. Can somebody of you help me? Thanks a lot Micha ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
