Gentlemen,
   From the looks of some of the current kinematics files I will
assume two things:

1: the 5 axis tool length compensation is handled outside the kinematics file.
2: the pivot length compensation is handled inside the kinematics file.

Unless otherwise advised I will construct my kins with these assumptions.

I am compensating for
an out of parallel condition between the A and X axes
and
an out of parallel condition between the B and Y axes
and
a condition where the center line of the spindle does not project
through the A axis
and
a condition where the center line of the spindle does not project
through the B axis
and
I am adding orthogonal compensation.

The algorithm I have now is an inverse kins.
I am working on the forward kins.

Future readability has been mentioned.
The algorithm gets complicated.
Would these be better handled as separate calculations?
A few gentlemen have a good idea of my coding skill (or lack thereof).
I used the term 'skill' with a grain of salt.
Possibly a kind soul would lend a hand on the final version. :)

thanks
Stuart

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada.
The future of the web can't happen without you.  Join us at MIX09 to help
pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to