Rainer Schmidt wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Andy Pugh<a...@andypugh.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:
>   
>> 2009/6/12  <cmg...@sover.net>:
>>
>>     
>>> My Favorite unit
>>>       
>
> In Germany we also use Angstrom per Millennium as Bureaucratic Unit. I
> observe similar speeds in the US. There seems to be some cross
> contamination in between processes.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
> Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited
> royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing 
> server and web deployment.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>
>   
My favorite unit is not a unit at all. It's instructions on a drawing 
that used to mean something to  machinist. Such as: "Machine In a 
workman like manner"  which I think meant to make it like a machinist 
and not like a jack legged mechanic.   
    Another was written on a drawing with dimensions and no tolerance 
but said, "Make to fit and function".  God help the guy that tried to 
make a spare part to the drawing. 
     Another thing often on a drawing was the bolt size length thread 
pitch and so on.  The position of the holes to be tapped was given but 
know depths. The machinist was expected to now how deep they should be.  
A steel bolt that was to go into as steel housing was to be tapped to 
the diameter of the bolt.  That was the correct thread length plus a 
little :-)  This to allow the bolt to break before stripping the thread. 
If the  housing was aluminum the machinist new the course thread was to 
be two times the bolt diameter. This again to allow the bolt to break.
     No depth dimension was ever put on a tap drilled hole because you 
had likely ground a new lead on your tap when it was needed. The 
engineer didn't  know how long the lead was so it was up to the machinist. 
    The only notation on the tap drilled hole other than location might 
be "drill through or through drill".  A tolerance was given on bolt hole 
location but no hole size, the machinist knew what size hole and counter 
bore based on location tolerance.
    In my opinion this was a huge complement and show of respect for the 
ability and knowledge of journeyman machinists.  Often you were given a 
shaft size and told what class fit the bore was to be without a dimension.
    I ran a shop with 30 machinists in it.  The only time I ever told a 
machinist how to do a job was if someone else was to do some other 
operations on it and most of my guys didn't even need that help.  I darn 
sure didn't hold back though if I didn't like the job he did or how long 
it took.  Each of them had a couple of apprentices.  
    When I hired a kid in the shop he served a four year apprentice ship 
when he finished he was a second class machinist. After six years five 
or six years he was first class  and was expected to take on an 
apprentice that he hired.  In nine or ten years he was a master 
machinist had a two machinists working for him and each of the 
machinists had a second class machinist and several apprentice boys. All 
these guys had a small gerstner toolbox which I gave them when the 
finished their appenticeship. the older guys almost never quite though 
some of the youg ones did when their apprenticeship was over..  I lot of 
the boys quit the first and second year. 
    Most of these master machinist worked directly with Nassa engineers 
and were very respected by them. They made wind tunnel models, stings 
and space mock ups and some things that went into space. The made steam 
turbine rotors for Battleships, spare blades,   babbitt bearings  and 
some bearings  for propeller shafts 26 inch bores, babbitt lined. 
    These guys now own and run the shop. It is smaller in size but still 
makes them a good living. I am retired.
    The story about Nassa making one part metric an the other imperial 
was tongue in cheek. The imperial dimensioned on the part  had metric 
bearings in it. We worked on that part and we made the arm on the first 
Mars Lander :-[   The one that didn't work. 
    What they did do for a short time was to dimension in inches but 
they represented metric dimensions.  They only did that for a short time 
as they slowly converted and the builders ,mechanics and machinists got 
used to working in metrics.  Mistakes ran rampant during that period.
                                                                         
                     Doug


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited
royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing 
server and web deployment.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to