Additional clarification (example of calling indirect). I think that I may have found a bug in the interpreter (at the very least a problem).
Where o<CallSubSub> has the following lines in it: o<CallSubSub> sub (...) o[#1] CALL [#2] [#3] [#4] [#5] [#6] [#7] ( Call routine referenced by #1 ) (...) o<CallSubSub> endsub This call works to call (indirect) o600 from within o<CallSubSub> o<CallSubSub> call [600] [-0.1161] [-0.0062] [0] [0] [0] [0] [0] However, if you change to named o-words, then this call reports a bad number format (since it is not a number but the name of the subroutine to be called). o<CallSubSub> call [<CutOutside>] [-0.1161] [-0.0062] Is this a bug? Is there a work around (using named o-words) at the moment? Alan --- Alan Condit 1085 Tierra Ct. Woodburn, OR 97071 Email -- acon...@ipns.com Home-Office (503) 982-0906 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing server and web deployment. http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
