On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 01:53:42PM +0100, Sven Wesley wrote: > > > I think you think too much. I have a machine with AMT's doing less than > 1/100 mm repeatability over 1000 cycles. I wasn't patient enough to wait for > longer. I was recommended by a guy who run them on retrofitted industry > machines in an environment far from ideal (mounted on 180V/50A motors with > _fat_ cables). > > Don't worry, they do their work like a charm.
Hmmm ... I think you could be right - I think too much. (But it used to save me weeks of work, and help keep my hair, when I was a programmer. ;-) Given that testimonial, I might buy a few extra, since they have to come so far. Many thanks for sharing your know-how, Sven. Erik -- I frequently hear "it's not rocket science, is it?". No, but I recently saw a slide of the infamous "O rings" which failed on the Challenger shuttle. Under a layer of frost, you can just read "Do not use in temperatures below 16C". So even rocket science is not rocket science. - User feedback on BBC website ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
