On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 22:46:02 +0000, you wrote:

>On 15 March 2010 22:05, Andy Pugh <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Running this code gives me the error
>> "Y value unspecified in xz plane canned cycle"
>> Which is a bit of a surprise given that the machine is a lathe (and LATHE = 
>> 1)
>> Replacing the G18 with G17 fixes the problem, but seems a bit
>> counter-intuitive.
>
>Chris has explained why this is on IRC, but I am still not convinced
>it makes sense.
>
>The reason for the G18 was to make G2 and G3 work in other parts of the code.
>G18 means canned-cycle movement in Y, so it is an error to use G18 and
>a canned cycle with a lathe.

Huhhh??? 

>However, it also doesn't seem to make any real sense to program G17
>(X,Y plane) on a machine which doesn't even have a Y axis.
>I might have argued that G83 etc are unambiguous on a lathe, but I
>suppose in principle you could use it as a peck-parting cycle in X.

Makes no sense whatsoever to program G17 when you are working in XZ
plane?

I know that Mach has two distinct sets of code for things like canned
cycles, one for mill and one for turn. I know that to be fact as I
worked with Art correcting the existing Mill ones to work correctly in
Turn. Perhaps it's being fudged to avoid writing more code?

Steve Blackmore
--

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to